PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CSY2.DE vs. IITU.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CSY2.DE vs. IITU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in CSIF (IE) MSCI USA ESG Leaders Blue UCITS ETF B USD (CSY2.DE) and iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IITU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

CSY2.DE is traded in EUR, while IITU.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the IITU.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSY2.DE achieves a 11.44% return, which is significantly lower than IITU.L's 18.76% return.


CSY2.DE

1D
0.58%
1M
0.44%
6M
10.76%
YTD
11.44%
1Y
22.74%
3Y*
18.51%
5Y*
13.48%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
16.36%

IITU.L

1D
1.29%
1M
-3.77%
6M
21.19%
YTD
18.76%
1Y
31.63%
3Y*
27.66%
5Y*
21.38%
10Y*
24.60%
ALL TIME*
18.11%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CSY2.DE vs. IITU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
CSY2.DE
CSIF (IE) MSCI USA ESG Leaders Blue UCITS ETF B USD
11.44%6.30%30.42%25.14%-16.59%44.53%12.20%
IITU.L
iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
18.76%8.47%47.65%53.89%-24.72%44.50%55.33%

Correlation

The correlation between CSY2.DE and IITU.L is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 16, 2020

0.79

The correlation between CSY2.DE and IITU.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CSY2.DE vs. IITU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CSY2.DE
CSY2.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
CSY2.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSY2.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSY2.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
CSY2.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSY2.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

IITU.L
IITU.L Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
IITU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IITU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
IITU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
IITU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
IITU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CSY2.DE vs. IITU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CSIF (IE) MSCI USA ESG Leaders Blue UCITS ETF B USD (CSY2.DE) and iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IITU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CSY2.DEIITU.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.25

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.48

2.00

+0.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.68

4.91

+3.78

CSY2.DE vs. IITU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSY2.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is comparable to the IITU.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSY2.DE and IITU.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CSY2.DE vs. IITU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSY2.DE drawdown since its inception was -24.56%, smaller than the maximum IITU.L drawdown of -47.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSY2.DE and IITU.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CSY2.DEIITU.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.56%

-47.18%

+22.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.14%

-15.78%

+6.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.56%

-29.94%

+5.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.56%

-29.94%

+5.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.17%

-7.42%

+6.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.72%

-10.92%

+6.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.61%

6.43%

-3.82%

Volatility

CSY2.DE vs. IITU.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for CSIF (IE) MSCI USA ESG Leaders Blue UCITS ETF B USD (CSY2.DE) is 3.30%, while iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IITU.L) has a volatility of 7.35%. This indicates that CSY2.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IITU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CSY2.DEIITU.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.30%

7.35%

-4.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.77%

16.45%

-7.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.58%

21.67%

-9.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.24%

26.95%

-10.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.42%

24.19%

-5.77%

CSY2.DE vs. IITU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

CSY2.DE has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than IITU.L's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

CSY2.DE vs. IITU.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither CSY2.DE nor IITU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


CSY2.DE and IITU.L have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CSY2.DE is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CSY2.DE is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for IITU.L.

CSY2.DE is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while IITU.L is Technology Equities. CSY2.DE tracks MSCI USA ESG Leaders, while IITU.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Information Technology Index. They also come from different issuers: Credit Suisse and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for CSY2.DE and 0.15% for IITU.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CSY2.DE and IITU.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer