PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CSY2.DE vs. EL4I.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CSY2.DE vs. EL4I.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in CSIF (IE) MSCI USA ESG Leaders Blue UCITS ETF B USD (CSY2.DE) and Deka MSCI USA Large Cap UCITS ETF (EL4I.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with CSY2.DE having a 10.74% return and EL4I.DE slightly higher at 10.91%.


CSY2.DE

1D
0.76%
1M
5.76%
YTD
10.74%
6M
11.43%
1Y
26.36%
3Y*
19.25%
5Y*
14.65%
10Y*

EL4I.DE

1D
-0.33%
1M
5.35%
YTD
10.91%
6M
11.20%
1Y
25.91%
3Y*
19.35%
5Y*
14.69%
10Y*
14.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CSY2.DE vs. EL4I.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
CSY2.DE
CSIF (IE) MSCI USA ESG Leaders Blue UCITS ETF B USD
10.74%6.30%30.42%25.14%-16.59%44.53%36.31%
EL4I.DE
Deka MSCI USA Large Cap UCITS ETF
10.91%5.10%32.52%24.65%-16.01%38.80%36.68%

Correlation

The correlation between CSY2.DE and EL4I.DE is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 18, 2020

0.82

The correlation between CSY2.DE and EL4I.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.79 (5 years) to 0.90 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CSY2.DE vs. EL4I.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CSY2.DE
CSY2.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
CSY2.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSY2.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSY2.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
CSY2.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSY2.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

EL4I.DE
EL4I.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
EL4I.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EL4I.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
EL4I.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
EL4I.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
EL4I.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CSY2.DE vs. EL4I.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CSIF (IE) MSCI USA ESG Leaders Blue UCITS ETF B USD (CSY2.DE) and Deka MSCI USA Large Cap UCITS ETF (EL4I.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CSY2.DEEL4I.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.37

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.87

3.59

-0.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.08

12.40

-2.32

CSY2.DE vs. EL4I.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSY2.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.10, which is comparable to the EL4I.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSY2.DE and EL4I.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CSY2.DEEL4I.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.10

2.09

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

0.85

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.18

0.70

+0.48

Drawdowns

CSY2.DE vs. EL4I.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSY2.DE drawdown since its inception was -24.56%, smaller than the maximum EL4I.DE drawdown of -38.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSY2.DE and EL4I.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CSY2.DEEL4I.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.56%

-38.74%

+14.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.14%

-7.19%

-1.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.56%

-23.91%

-0.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.56%

-23.91%

-0.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.02%

-0.56%

+0.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.64%

-5.37%

+0.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.61%

2.08%

+0.53%

Volatility

CSY2.DE vs. EL4I.DE - Volatility Comparison

CSIF (IE) MSCI USA ESG Leaders Blue UCITS ETF B USD (CSY2.DE) has a higher volatility of 3.21% compared to Deka MSCI USA Large Cap UCITS ETF (EL4I.DE) at 2.74%. This indicates that CSY2.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EL4I.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CSY2.DEEL4I.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.21%

2.74%

+0.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.56%

7.90%

+0.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.52%

12.37%

+0.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.24%

17.10%

-0.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.19%

16.98%

+0.21%

CSY2.DE vs. EL4I.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

CSY2.DE has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than EL4I.DE's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

CSY2.DE vs. EL4I.DE - Dividend Comparison

CSY2.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EL4I.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.46%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CSY2.DE
CSIF (IE) MSCI USA ESG Leaders Blue UCITS ETF B USD
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
EL4I.DE
Deka MSCI USA Large Cap UCITS ETF
0.46%0.59%0.72%0.98%0.95%0.56%0.87%0.99%1.17%1.07%1.10%1.66%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, CSY2.DE and EL4I.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, CSY2.DE is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CSY2.DE is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for EL4I.DE.

CSY2.DE tracks MSCI USA ESG Leaders, while EL4I.DE tracks MSCI USA Large Cap. They also come from different issuers: Credit Suisse and Deka Investment GmbH. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for CSY2.DE and 0.30% for EL4I.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CSY2.DE and EL4I.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer