CSY2.DE vs. D6RQ.DE

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

CSY2.DE (CSIF (IE) MSCI USA ESG Leaders Blue UCITS ETF B USD) and D6RQ.DE (Deka MSCI USA Climate Change ESG UCITS ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - CSY2.DE tracks the MSCI USA ESG Leaders while D6RQ.DE tracks the MSCI USA Climate Change ESG Select. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CSY2.DE returned 14.65%/yr vs 17.54%/yr for D6RQ.DE. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CSY2.DE charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for D6RQ.DE.

Performance

CSY2.DE vs. D6RQ.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in CSIF (IE) MSCI USA ESG Leaders Blue UCITS ETF B USD (CSY2.DE) and Deka MSCI USA Climate Change ESG UCITS ETF (D6RQ.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSY2.DE achieves a 10.74% return, which is significantly lower than D6RQ.DE's 14.41% return.

CSY2.DE

• 1D: 0.76%
• 1M: 5.76%
• YTD: 10.74%
• 6M: 11.43%
• 1Y: 26.36%
• 3Y*: 19.25%
• 5Y*: 14.65%
• 10Y*: —

D6RQ.DE

• 1D: -0.56%
• 1M: 8.70%
• YTD: 14.41%
• 6M: 14.10%
• 1Y: 33.24%
• 3Y*: 23.10%
• 5Y*: 17.54%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CSY2.DE vs. D6RQ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
CSY2.DE CSIF (IE) MSCI USA ESG Leaders Blue UCITS ETF B USD	10.74%	6.30%	30.42%	25.14%	-16.59%	44.53%	9.10%
D6RQ.DE Deka MSCI USA Climate Change ESG UCITS ETF	14.41%	4.36%	42.08%	34.15%	-22.07%	41.44%	12.56%

Correlation

The correlation between CSY2.DE and D6RQ.DE is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.91
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.92
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.92
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2020	0.92

The correlation between CSY2.DE and D6RQ.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

CSY2.DE vs. D6RQ.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CSY2.DE

CSY2.DE Risk / Return Rank: 61
CSY2.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
CSY2.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
CSY2.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 63
CSY2.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
CSY2.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 58

D6RQ.DE

D6RQ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 61
D6RQ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
D6RQ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
D6RQ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 66
D6RQ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
D6RQ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 48

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CSY2.DE vs. D6RQ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CSIF (IE) MSCI USA ESG Leaders Blue UCITS ETF B USD (CSY2.DE) and Deka MSCI USA Climate Change ESG UCITS ETF (D6RQ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CSY2.DE	D6RQ.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.10	2.23	-0.13
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.86	2.97	-0.11
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.39	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.87	2.69	+0.18
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.08	7.85	+2.23
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CSY2.DE vs. D6RQ.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSY2.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.10, which is comparable to the D6RQ.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSY2.DE and D6RQ.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CSY2.DE	D6RQ.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.10	2.23	-0.13
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.90	0.97	-0.08
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.18	1.09	+0.09

Drawdowns

CSY2.DE vs. D6RQ.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSY2.DE drawdown since its inception was -24.56%, smaller than the maximum D6RQ.DE drawdown of -27.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSY2.DE and D6RQ.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	CSY2.DE	D6RQ.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.56%	-27.29%	+2.73%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.14%	-12.28%	+3.14%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.56%	-27.29%	+2.73%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.56%	-27.29%	+2.73%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.02%	-0.84%	+0.82%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.64%	-5.82%	+1.18%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.61%	4.22%	-1.61%

Volatility

CSY2.DE vs. D6RQ.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for CSIF (IE) MSCI USA ESG Leaders Blue UCITS ETF B USD (CSY2.DE) is 3.21%, while Deka MSCI USA Climate Change ESG UCITS ETF (D6RQ.DE) has a volatility of 4.06%. This indicates that CSY2.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than D6RQ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CSY2.DE	D6RQ.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.21%	4.06%	-0.85%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.56%	10.35%	-1.79%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.52%	14.84%	-2.32%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.24%	17.79%	-1.55%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.19%	17.56%	-0.37%

CSY2.DE vs. D6RQ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

CSY2.DE has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than D6RQ.DE's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

CSY2.DE vs. D6RQ.DE - Dividend Comparison

CSY2.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while D6RQ.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
CSY2.DE CSIF (IE) MSCI USA ESG Leaders Blue UCITS ETF B USD	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
D6RQ.DE Deka MSCI USA Climate Change ESG UCITS ETF	0.37%	0.53%	0.39%	0.60%	0.80%	0.46%	0.25%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CSY2.DE and D6RQ.DE in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, CSY2.DE and D6RQ.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, CSY2.DE or D6RQ.DE?

On fees, CSY2.DE is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CSY2.DE or D6RQ.DE?

CSY2.DE is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for D6RQ.DE.

What is the main difference between CSY2.DE and D6RQ.DE?

CSY2.DE tracks MSCI USA ESG Leaders, while D6RQ.DE tracks MSCI USA Climate Change ESG Select. They also come from different issuers: Credit Suisse and Deka. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for CSY2.DE and 0.25% for D6RQ.DE.