PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CSY2.DE vs. D6RP.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CSY2.DE vs. D6RP.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in CSIF (IE) MSCI USA ESG Leaders Blue UCITS ETF B USD (CSY2.DE) and Deka MSCI World Climate Change ESG UCITS ETF (D6RP.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSY2.DE achieves a 11.44% return, which is significantly higher than D6RP.DE's 10.71% return.


CSY2.DE

1D
0.58%
1M
0.44%
6M
10.76%
YTD
11.44%
1Y
22.74%
3Y*
18.51%
5Y*
13.48%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
16.36%

D6RP.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
-1.05%
6M
11.04%
YTD
10.71%
1Y
22.55%
3Y*
18.95%
5Y*
13.08%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
16.23%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CSY2.DE vs. D6RP.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
CSY2.DE
CSIF (IE) MSCI USA ESG Leaders Blue UCITS ETF B USD
11.44%6.30%30.42%25.14%-16.59%44.53%9.29%
D6RP.DE
Deka MSCI World Climate Change ESG UCITS ETF
10.71%6.56%34.46%27.65%-19.59%35.02%13.55%

Correlation

The correlation between CSY2.DE and D6RP.DE is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 19, 2020

0.91

The correlation between CSY2.DE and D6RP.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CSY2.DE vs. D6RP.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CSY2.DE
CSY2.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
CSY2.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSY2.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSY2.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
CSY2.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSY2.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

D6RP.DE
D6RP.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
D6RP.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
D6RP.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
D6RP.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
D6RP.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
D6RP.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CSY2.DE vs. D6RP.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CSIF (IE) MSCI USA ESG Leaders Blue UCITS ETF B USD (CSY2.DE) and Deka MSCI World Climate Change ESG UCITS ETF (D6RP.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CSY2.DED6RP.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.29

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.48

2.33

+0.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.68

8.06

+0.62

CSY2.DE vs. D6RP.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSY2.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is comparable to the D6RP.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSY2.DE and D6RP.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CSY2.DE vs. D6RP.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSY2.DE drawdown since its inception was -24.56%, roughly equal to the maximum D6RP.DE drawdown of -23.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSY2.DE and D6RP.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CSY2.DED6RP.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.56%

-23.89%

-0.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.14%

-9.63%

+0.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.56%

-23.89%

-0.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.56%

-23.89%

-0.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.17%

-2.20%

+1.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.72%

-5.00%

+0.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.61%

2.79%

-0.18%

Volatility

CSY2.DE vs. D6RP.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for CSIF (IE) MSCI USA ESG Leaders Blue UCITS ETF B USD (CSY2.DE) is 3.30%, while Deka MSCI World Climate Change ESG UCITS ETF (D6RP.DE) has a volatility of 3.79%. This indicates that CSY2.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than D6RP.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CSY2.DED6RP.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.30%

3.79%

-0.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.77%

10.06%

-1.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.58%

13.68%

-1.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.24%

16.02%

+0.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.42%

15.72%

+2.70%

CSY2.DE vs. D6RP.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

CSY2.DE has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than D6RP.DE's 0.26% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

CSY2.DE vs. D6RP.DE - Dividend Comparison

CSY2.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while D6RP.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.74%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
CSY2.DE
CSIF (IE) MSCI USA ESG Leaders Blue UCITS ETF B USD
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
D6RP.DE
Deka MSCI World Climate Change ESG UCITS ETF
0.74%0.79%0.70%1.04%1.23%0.79%0.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, CSY2.DE and D6RP.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, CSY2.DE is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CSY2.DE is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.26% for D6RP.DE.

CSY2.DE is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while D6RP.DE is Global Equities. CSY2.DE tracks MSCI USA ESG Leaders, while D6RP.DE tracks MSCI World Climate Change ESG Select. They also come from different issuers: Credit Suisse and Deka. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for CSY2.DE and 0.26% for D6RP.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CSY2.DE and D6RP.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer