PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CSX5.L vs. MVEU.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CSX5.L vs. MVEU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares VII plc - iShares Core EURO STOXX 50 ETF EUR Acc (CSX5.L) and iShares Edge MSCI Europe Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (MVEU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with CSX5.L having a 9.88% return and MVEU.L slightly lower at 9.39%. Over the past 10 years, CSX5.L has outperformed MVEU.L with an annualized return of 10.96%, while MVEU.L has yielded a comparatively lower 6.96% annualized return.


CSX5.L

1D
-0.90%
1M
-1.04%
6M
5.43%
YTD
9.88%
1Y
18.88%
3Y*
15.71%
5Y*
12.33%
10Y*
10.96%

MVEU.L

1D
0.78%
1M
2.33%
6M
7.23%
YTD
9.39%
1Y
11.84%
3Y*
12.06%
5Y*
7.16%
10Y*
6.96%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CSX5.L vs. MVEU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CSX5.L
iShares VII plc - iShares Core EURO STOXX 50 ETF EUR Acc
9.88%21.71%11.38%22.29%-8.36%23.37%-2.27%28.04%-11.52%10.61%
MVEU.L
iShares Edge MSCI Europe Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)
9.39%11.66%11.79%10.66%-12.67%21.67%-3.86%22.42%-3.82%9.48%

Correlation

The correlation between CSX5.L and MVEU.L is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 30, 2012

0.79

Over the past year, the correlation between CSX5.L and MVEU.L has dropped to 0.55 - well below their long-term average of 0.79, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

CSX5.L vs. MVEU.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CSX5.L
MVEU.L

Financial Services

26.4%
17.7%

Industrials

22.1%
15.6%

Technology

16.3%
3.5%

Consumer Cyclical

9.7%
3.6%

Consumer Defensive

5.5%
14.5%

Healthcare

5.4%
12.8%

Utilities

4.9%
10.0%

Energy

4.4%
6.6%

Basic Materials

3.5%
5.2%

Communication Services

1.9%
8.3%

Real Estate

-

1.5%

Financial Services

CSX5.L
26.4%
MVEU.L
17.7%

Industrials

CSX5.L
22.1%
MVEU.L
15.6%

Technology

CSX5.L
16.3%
MVEU.L
3.5%

Consumer Cyclical

CSX5.L
9.7%
MVEU.L
3.6%

Consumer Defensive

CSX5.L
5.5%
MVEU.L
14.5%

Healthcare

CSX5.L
5.4%
MVEU.L
12.8%

Utilities

CSX5.L
4.9%
MVEU.L
10.0%

Energy

CSX5.L
4.4%
MVEU.L
6.6%

Basic Materials

CSX5.L
3.5%
MVEU.L
5.2%

Communication Services

CSX5.L
1.9%
MVEU.L
8.3%

Real Estate

CSX5.L

-

MVEU.L
1.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CSX5.L vs. MVEU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CSX5.L
CSX5.L Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
CSX5.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSX5.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSX5.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
CSX5.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSX5.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

MVEU.L
MVEU.L Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
MVEU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MVEU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
MVEU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
MVEU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
MVEU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CSX5.L vs. MVEU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares VII plc - iShares Core EURO STOXX 50 ETF EUR Acc (CSX5.L) and iShares Edge MSCI Europe Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (MVEU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CSX5.LMVEU.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.24

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.73

1.68

+0.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.05

5.18

+0.87

CSX5.L vs. MVEU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSX5.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.20, which is comparable to the MVEU.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSX5.L and MVEU.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CSX5.L vs. MVEU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSX5.L drawdown since its inception was -37.87%, which is greater than MVEU.L's maximum drawdown of -30.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSX5.L and MVEU.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CSX5.LMVEU.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.87%

-30.56%

-7.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.87%

-7.04%

-3.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.34%

-10.78%

-5.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.61%

-19.51%

-4.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.87%

-30.56%

-7.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.79%

0.00%

-2.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.93%

-4.53%

-2.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.12%

2.28%

+0.84%

Volatility

CSX5.L vs. MVEU.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares VII plc - iShares Core EURO STOXX 50 ETF EUR Acc (CSX5.L) has a higher volatility of 4.09% compared to iShares Edge MSCI Europe Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (MVEU.L) at 2.38%. This indicates that CSX5.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MVEU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CSX5.LMVEU.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.09%

2.38%

+1.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.00%

7.25%

+5.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.74%

8.81%

+6.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.34%

11.05%

+6.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.84%

12.15%

+5.69%

CSX5.L vs. MVEU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

CSX5.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than MVEU.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

CSX5.L vs. MVEU.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither CSX5.L nor MVEU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


CSX5.L and MVEU.L have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CSX5.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CSX5.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for MVEU.L.

CSX5.L tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR, while MVEU.L tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for CSX5.L and 0.25% for MVEU.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CSX5.L and MVEU.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer