PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CSX5.L vs. JRDZ.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CSX5.L vs. JRDZ.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares VII plc - iShares Core EURO STOXX 50 ETF EUR Acc (CSX5.L) and JPMorgan Eurozone Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF EUR (dist) (JRDZ.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

CSX5.L is traded in EUR, while JRDZ.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the JRDZ.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period


CSX5.L

1D
-0.62%
1M
1.19%
YTD
6.76%
6M
7.89%
1Y
14.88%
3Y*
15.36%
5Y*
11.38%
10Y*
10.27%

JRDZ.L

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CSX5.L vs. JRDZ.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CSX5.L
CSX5.L Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
CSX5.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSX5.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSX5.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
CSX5.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSX5.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

JRDZ.L
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CSX5.L vs. JRDZ.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares VII plc - iShares Core EURO STOXX 50 ETF EUR Acc (CSX5.L) and JPMorgan Eurozone Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF EUR (dist) (JRDZ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CSX5.LJRDZ.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.63

CSX5.L vs. JRDZ.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CSX5.LJRDZ.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

Drawdowns

CSX5.L vs. JRDZ.L - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CSX5.LJRDZ.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.21%

Volatility

CSX5.L vs. JRDZ.L - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CSX5.LJRDZ.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.20%

CSX5.L vs. JRDZ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

CSX5.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than JRDZ.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

CSX5.L vs. JRDZ.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither CSX5.L nor JRDZ.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


On fees, CSX5.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CSX5.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for JRDZ.L.

Both ETFs track MSCI EMU NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: iShares and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for CSX5.L and 0.25% for JRDZ.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CSX5.L and JRDZ.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer