PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
CSWG.L vs. MVEU.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

CSWG.L vs. MVEU.L

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

CSWG.L (Amundi MSCI Switzerland UCITS ETF CHF) and MVEU.L (iShares Edge MSCI Europe Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)) are both Europe Equities funds - CSWG.L tracks the MSCI Switzerland NR CHF while MVEU.L tracks the MSCI Europe NR EUR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CSWG.L returned 7.19%/yr vs 7.98%/yr for MVEU.L. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.25% expense ratio.

Performance

CSWG.L vs. MVEU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Amundi MSCI Switzerland UCITS ETF CHF (CSWG.L) and iShares Edge MSCI Europe Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (MVEU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

CSWG.L is traded in GBp, while MVEU.L is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the MVEU.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSWG.L achieves a 8.82% return, which is significantly higher than MVEU.L's 5.99% return. Over the past 10 years, CSWG.L has underperformed MVEU.L with an annualized return of 7.19%, while MVEU.L has yielded a comparatively higher 7.98% annualized return.

CSWG.L

1D
1.47%
1M
3.63%
YTD
8.82%
6M
8.12%
1Y
22.96%
3Y*
12.00%
5Y*
8.19%
10Y*
7.19%

MVEU.L

1D
0.50%
1M
-0.08%
YTD
5.99%
6M
6.28%
1Y
10.48%
3Y*
11.60%
5Y*
7.13%
10Y*
7.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CSWG.L vs. MVEU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CSWG.L
Amundi MSCI Switzerland UCITS ETF CHF		8.82%23.37%-0.59%8.57%-7.50%19.77%7.79%26.88%-26.62%17.10%
MVEU.L
iShares Edge MSCI Europe Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)		5.99%17.63%6.71%8.45%-8.16%14.46%1.57%15.47%-2.87%14.16%

Correlation

The correlation between CSWG.L and MVEU.L is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 30, 2012

0.72

The correlation between CSWG.L and MVEU.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

CSWG.L vs. MVEU.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
CSWG.L
MVEU.L

Healthcare

37.9%
12.3%

Financial Services

19.4%
17.6%

Consumer Defensive

14.3%
14.1%

Industrials

13.3%
15.6%

Consumer Cyclical

6.3%
3.6%

Basic Materials

5.9%
5.1%

Energy

2.7%
6.9%

Communication Services

1.1%
9.0%

Technology

0.9%
3.4%

Real Estate

0.7%
1.5%

Utilities

0.2%
10.1%

Healthcare

CSWG.L
37.9%
MVEU.L
12.3%

Financial Services

CSWG.L
19.4%
MVEU.L
17.6%

Consumer Defensive

CSWG.L
14.3%
MVEU.L
14.1%

Industrials

CSWG.L
13.3%
MVEU.L
15.6%

Consumer Cyclical

CSWG.L
6.3%
MVEU.L
3.6%

Basic Materials

CSWG.L
5.9%
MVEU.L
5.1%

Energy

CSWG.L
2.7%
MVEU.L
6.9%

Communication Services

CSWG.L
1.1%
MVEU.L
9.0%

Technology

CSWG.L
0.9%
MVEU.L
3.4%

Real Estate

CSWG.L
0.7%
MVEU.L
1.5%

Utilities

CSWG.L
0.2%
MVEU.L
10.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Amundi MSCI Switzerland UCITS ETF CHF

iShares Edge MSCI Europe Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)

Often compared with CSWG.L:
CSWG.L vs. VTCSWG.L vs. SPYCSWG.L vs. CS1.LCSWG.L vs. IMV.LCSWG.L vs. MIVO.LCSWG.L vs. FEUZ.LCSWG.L vs. CW8G.L
Often compared with MVEU.L:
MVEU.L vs. SVOLMVEU.L vs. VTMVEU.L vs. FLXD.LMVEU.L vs. EUHD.LMVEU.L vs. CS1.LMVEU.L vs. CSP1.LMVEU.L vs. IITU.L

Return for Risk

CSWG.L vs. MVEU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
CSWG.L
CSWG.L Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
CSWG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSWG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSWG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
CSWG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSWG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
MVEU.L
MVEU.L Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
MVEU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MVEU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
MVEU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
MVEU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
MVEU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CSWG.L vs. MVEU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI Switzerland UCITS ETF CHF (CSWG.L) and iShares Edge MSCI Europe Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (MVEU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

CSWG.LMVEU.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.76
1.17

+0.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.45
1.63

+0.81

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.21

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.83

1.25

+0.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.83

3.71

+2.12

CSWG.L vs. MVEU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSWG.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.76, which is higher than the MVEU.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSWG.L and MVEU.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CSWG.L vs. MVEU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSWG.L drawdown since its inception was -33.48%, which is greater than MVEU.L's maximum drawdown of -23.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSWG.L and MVEU.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

CSWG.LMVEU.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.48%

-23.74%

-9.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.52%

-8.32%

-4.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.52%

-8.32%

-4.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.26%

-17.42%

+1.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.48%

-23.74%

-9.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.07%

-3.45%

+3.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.70%

-3.52%

-3.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.93%

2.82%

+1.11%

Volatility

CSWG.L vs. MVEU.L - Volatility Comparison

Amundi MSCI Switzerland UCITS ETF CHF (CSWG.L) has a higher volatility of 3.88% compared to iShares Edge MSCI Europe Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (MVEU.L) at 1.88%. This indicates that CSWG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MVEU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

CSWG.LMVEU.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.88%

1.88%

+2.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.53%

7.31%

+3.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.04%

8.92%

+4.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.03%

11.28%

+1.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.86%

12.62%

+3.24%

CSWG.L vs. MVEU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both CSWG.L and MVEU.L have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

CSWG.L vs. MVEU.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither CSWG.L nor MVEU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

CSWG.L and MVEU.L have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CSWG.L and MVEU.L have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.

CSWG.L tracks MSCI Switzerland NR CHF, while MVEU.L tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CSWG.L and MVEU.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer