PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CSWC vs. CLOI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CSWC vs. CLOI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Capital Southwest Corporation (CSWC) and VanEck CLO ETF (CLOI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSWC achieves a 16.48% return, which is significantly higher than CLOI's 2.58% return.


CSWC

1D
1.09%
1M
5.07%
6M
7.88%
YTD
16.48%
1Y
17.94%
3Y*
17.33%
5Y*
10.98%
10Y*
17.66%

CLOI

1D
0.00%
1M
0.28%
6M
2.52%
YTD
2.58%
1Y
5.29%
3Y*
6.90%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CSWC vs. CLOI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
CSWC
Capital Southwest Corporation
16.48%14.28%2.14%56.10%-1.35%
CLOI
VanEck CLO ETF
2.58%5.84%8.26%8.95%2.55%

Correlation

The correlation between CSWC and CLOI is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2022

0.07

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CSWC vs. CLOI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CSWC
CSWC Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
CSWC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSWC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSWC Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
CSWC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSWC Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

CLOI
CLOI Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
CLOI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CLOI Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
CLOI Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
CLOI Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
CLOI Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CSWC vs. CLOI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Southwest Corporation (CSWC) and VanEck CLO ETF (CLOI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CSWCCLOIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.89

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-6.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

2.21

-1.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.14

8.50

-7.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.65

41.12

-37.47

CSWC vs. CLOI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSWC Sharpe Ratio is 0.95, which is lower than the CLOI Sharpe Ratio of 4.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSWC and CLOI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CSWC vs. CLOI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSWC drawdown since its inception was -68.33%, which is greater than CLOI's maximum drawdown of -3.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSWC and CLOI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CSWCCLOIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.33%

-3.25%

-65.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.75%

-0.62%

-15.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.74%

-3.25%

-24.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.31%

-0.18%

-18.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.93%

0.13%

+4.80%

Volatility

CSWC vs. CLOI - Volatility Comparison

Capital Southwest Corporation (CSWC) has a higher volatility of 4.70% compared to VanEck CLO ETF (CLOI) at 0.29%. This indicates that CSWC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CLOI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CSWCCLOIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.70%

0.29%

+4.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.53%

0.67%

+12.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.92%

1.10%

+17.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.24%

2.52%

+19.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.40%

2.52%

+24.88%

Dividends

CSWC vs. CLOI - Dividend Comparison

CSWC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.58%, more than CLOI's 5.27% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CLOI
VanEck CLO ETF
5.27%5.61%6.71%5.61%2.23%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
CSWC
Capital Southwest Corporation
10.58%11.56%11.59%10.21%12.46%10.13%11.49%13.07%10.77%7.01%2.35%216.86%

Frequently Asked Questions


CSWC and CLOI have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CSWC has higher volatility (4.70%) compared to CLOI (0.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CSWC dropped -68.33% vs CLOI's -3.25%.

CLOI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.84 vs 0.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CSWC and CLOI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer