CSUIX vs. PGJZX
Compare and contrast key facts about Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc. (CSUIX) and PGIM Jennison Global Infrastructure Fund (PGJZX).
CSUIX is managed by Cohen & Steers. It was launched on May 2, 2004. PGJZX is managed by PGIM. It was launched on Sep 24, 2013.
Performance
CSUIX vs. PGJZX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CSUIX vs. PGJZX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSUIX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc. | 8.44% | 14.69% | 8.74% | 2.46% | -4.89% | 16.60% | -1.29% | 24.72% | -5.52% | 18.15% |
PGJZX PGIM Jennison Global Infrastructure Fund | 7.80% | 18.41% | 17.13% | 5.85% | -7.82% | 15.06% | 1.98% | 28.89% | -8.57% | 18.81% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CSUIX achieves a 8.44% return, which is significantly higher than PGJZX's 7.80% return. Over the past 10 years, CSUIX has underperformed PGJZX with an annualized return of 7.83%, while PGJZX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.48% annualized return.
CSUIX
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- -4.36%
- YTD
- 8.44%
- 6M
- 9.16%
- 1Y
- 18.40%
- 3Y*
- 11.18%
- 5Y*
- 8.17%
- 10Y*
- 7.83%
PGJZX
- 1D
- 0.42%
- 1M
- -5.07%
- YTD
- 7.80%
- 6M
- 9.57%
- 1Y
- 22.67%
- 3Y*
- 15.87%
- 5Y*
- 10.96%
- 10Y*
- 9.48%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CSUIX vs. PGJZX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CSUIX has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is lower than PGJZX's 1.17% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CSUIX vs. PGJZX — Risk / Return Rank
CSUIX
PGJZX
CSUIX vs. PGJZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc. (CSUIX) and PGIM Jennison Global Infrastructure Fund (PGJZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CSUIX | PGJZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.67 | 1.84 | -0.17 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.21 | 2.37 | -0.16 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.37 | -0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.42 | 3.00 | -0.59 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.58 | 12.28 | -1.70 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CSUIX | PGJZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.67 | 1.84 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 | 0.77 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 | 0.60 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 0.54 | +0.04 |
Correlation
The correlation between CSUIX and PGJZX is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
CSUIX vs. PGJZX - Dividend Comparison
CSUIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.76%, more than PGJZX's 6.67% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSUIX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc. | 7.76% | 8.41% | 2.58% | 2.53% | 3.91% | 3.25% | 1.64% | 1.83% | 2.45% | 5.12% | 2.35% | 6.52% |
PGJZX PGIM Jennison Global Infrastructure Fund | 6.67% | 7.18% | 9.95% | 1.59% | 3.30% | 7.77% | 1.17% | 1.58% | 2.13% | 1.35% | 1.71% | 1.42% |
Drawdowns
CSUIX vs. PGJZX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSUIX drawdown since its inception was -52.01%, which is greater than PGJZX's maximum drawdown of -36.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSUIX and PGJZX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSUIX | PGJZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.01% | -36.64% | -15.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.99% | -7.74% | -0.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.01% | -20.56% | +0.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.01% | -36.64% | +1.63% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.36% | -5.07% | +0.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.21% | -5.66% | -2.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.82% | 1.89% | -0.07% |
Volatility
CSUIX vs. PGJZX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc. (CSUIX) is 3.24%, while PGIM Jennison Global Infrastructure Fund (PGJZX) has a volatility of 4.49%. This indicates that CSUIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PGJZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CSUIX | PGJZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.24% | 4.49% | -1.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.90% | 7.44% | -0.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.49% | 12.48% | -0.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.86% | 14.22% | -1.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.88% | 15.73% | -0.85% |