CSUAX vs. FAPMX

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX) and Fidelity Advisor Healthy Future Fund (FAPMX).

CSUAX is a passively managed fund by Cohen & Steers that tracks the performance of the FTSE Global Core Infrastructure 50/50 Index. It was launched on Aug 28, 2017. FAPMX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on May 23, 2022.

Performance

CSUAX vs. FAPMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX) and Fidelity Advisor Healthy Future Fund (FAPMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CSUAX vs. FAPMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
CSUAX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A	9.35%	14.30%	8.30%	2.09%	-6.07%
FAPMX Fidelity Advisor Healthy Future Fund	-4.27%	7.56%	17.12%	18.85%	-4.79%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSUAX achieves a 9.35% return, which is significantly higher than FAPMX's -4.27% return.

CSUAX

• 1D: 0.92%
• 1M: -3.22%
• YTD: 9.35%
• 6M: 9.96%
• 1Y: 18.42%
• 3Y*: 11.11%
• 5Y*: 7.91%
• 10Y*: 7.58%

FAPMX

• 1D: 2.52%
• 1M: -6.34%
• YTD: -4.27%
• 6M: -2.31%
• 1Y: 7.68%
• 3Y*: 9.73%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CSUAX vs. FAPMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CSUAX has a 1.22% expense ratio, which is higher than FAPMX's 1.04% expense ratio.

CSUAX

Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A

FAPMX

Fidelity Advisor Healthy Future Fund

Return for Risk

CSUAX vs. FAPMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CSUAX

CSUAX Risk / Return Rank: 83
CSUAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
CSUAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
CSUAX Omega Ratio Rank: 78
CSUAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
CSUAX Martin Ratio Rank: 89

FAPMX

FAPMX Risk / Return Rank: 18
FAPMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 16
FAPMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
FAPMX Omega Ratio Rank: 15
FAPMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
FAPMX Martin Ratio Rank: 22

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CSUAX vs. FAPMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX) and Fidelity Advisor Healthy Future Fund (FAPMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CSUAX	FAPMX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.68	0.53	+1.15
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.23	0.84	+1.39
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.12	+0.21
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.45	0.77	+1.68
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	10.62	2.97	+7.64
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CSUAX vs. FAPMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSUAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.68, which is higher than the FAPMX Sharpe Ratio of 0.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSUAX and FAPMX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CSUAX	FAPMX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.68	0.53	+1.15
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.62	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.51	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.55	0.56	0.00

Correlation

The correlation between CSUAX and FAPMX is 0.58, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

CSUAX vs. FAPMX - Dividend Comparison

CSUAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.39%, more than FAPMX's 1.51% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CSUAX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A	7.39%	8.09%	2.23%	2.17%	3.55%	2.95%	1.30%	1.52%	2.08%	5.00%	2.04%	6.20%
FAPMX Fidelity Advisor Healthy Future Fund	1.51%	1.44%	0.07%	0.07%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

CSUAX vs. FAPMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSUAX drawdown since its inception was -52.20%, which is greater than FAPMX's maximum drawdown of -16.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSUAX and FAPMX.

Drawdown Indicators

	CSUAX	FAPMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-52.20%	-16.95%	-35.25%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.98%	-10.27%	+2.29%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.45%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.05%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.50%	-7.94%	+4.44%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.49%	-4.12%	-4.37%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.84%	2.67%	-0.83%

Volatility

CSUAX vs. FAPMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX) is 3.44%, while Fidelity Advisor Healthy Future Fund (FAPMX) has a volatility of 5.83%. This indicates that CSUAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FAPMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CSUAX	FAPMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.44%	5.83%	-2.39%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.89%	8.67%	-1.78%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.49%	14.77%	-3.28%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.89%	15.26%	-2.37%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.89%	15.26%	-0.37%