CSUAX vs. DQEIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX) and BNY Mellon Global Equity Income Fund (DQEIX).
CSUAX is a passively managed fund by Cohen & Steers that tracks the performance of the FTSE Global Core Infrastructure 50/50 Index. It was launched on Aug 28, 2017. DQEIX is managed by Dreyfus. It was launched on Oct 17, 2007.
Performance
CSUAX vs. DQEIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CSUAX vs. DQEIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSUAX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 8.35% | 14.30% | 8.30% | 2.09% | -5.20% | 16.24% | -1.65% | 24.26% | -5.83% | 17.99% |
DQEIX BNY Mellon Global Equity Income Fund | 1.02% | 24.64% | 6.54% | 9.70% | -3.72% | 14.32% | 5.62% | 25.80% | -5.61% | 18.18% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CSUAX achieves a 8.35% return, which is significantly higher than DQEIX's 1.02% return. Over the past 10 years, CSUAX has underperformed DQEIX with an annualized return of 7.48%, while DQEIX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.43% annualized return.
CSUAX
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- -4.38%
- YTD
- 8.35%
- 6M
- 8.97%
- 1Y
- 17.98%
- 3Y*
- 10.78%
- 5Y*
- 7.79%
- 10Y*
- 7.48%
DQEIX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -9.39%
- YTD
- 1.02%
- 6M
- 6.43%
- 1Y
- 16.67%
- 3Y*
- 12.04%
- 5Y*
- 9.27%
- 10Y*
- 9.43%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CSUAX vs. DQEIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CSUAX has a 1.22% expense ratio, which is higher than DQEIX's 0.92% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CSUAX vs. DQEIX — Risk / Return Rank
CSUAX
DQEIX
CSUAX vs. DQEIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX) and BNY Mellon Global Equity Income Fund (DQEIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CSUAX | DQEIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.63 | 1.18 | +0.45 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.17 | 1.60 | +0.57 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.24 | +0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.36 | 1.32 | +1.04 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.32 | 5.46 | +4.86 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CSUAX | DQEIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.63 | 1.18 | +0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 | 0.73 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 | 0.65 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.55 | 0.42 | +0.13 |
Correlation
The correlation between CSUAX and DQEIX is 0.79, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
CSUAX vs. DQEIX - Dividend Comparison
CSUAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.46%, less than DQEIX's 12.95% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSUAX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 7.46% | 8.09% | 2.23% | 2.17% | 3.55% | 2.95% | 1.30% | 1.52% | 2.08% | 5.00% | 2.04% | 6.20% |
DQEIX BNY Mellon Global Equity Income Fund | 12.95% | 13.55% | 12.56% | 7.65% | 14.39% | 12.69% | 1.97% | 3.41% | 10.50% | 5.32% | 5.83% | 6.94% |
Drawdowns
CSUAX vs. DQEIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSUAX drawdown since its inception was -52.20%, roughly equal to the maximum DQEIX drawdown of -52.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSUAX and DQEIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSUAX | DQEIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.20% | -52.75% | +0.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.98% | -11.41% | +3.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.45% | -18.65% | -1.80% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.05% | -32.69% | -2.36% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.38% | -9.39% | +5.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.49% | -7.24% | -1.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.83% | 2.77% | -0.94% |
Volatility
CSUAX vs. DQEIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX) is 3.26%, while BNY Mellon Global Equity Income Fund (DQEIX) has a volatility of 4.51%. This indicates that CSUAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DQEIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CSUAX | DQEIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.26% | 4.51% | -1.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.89% | 7.69% | -0.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.48% | 13.75% | -2.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.89% | 12.78% | +0.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.89% | 14.58% | +0.31% |