CSSX5E.MI vs. SWDA.L
CSSX5E.MI (iShares Core EURO STOXX 50 ETF EUR Acc) and SWDA.L (iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - CSSX5E.MI is a Europe Equities fund tracking the EURO STOXX® 50, while SWDA.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI World Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CSSX5E.MI returned 11.32%/yr vs 13.07%/yr for SWDA.L. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CSSX5E.MI charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for SWDA.L.
Performance
CSSX5E.MI vs. SWDA.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
CSSX5E.MI is traded in EUR, while SWDA.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the SWDA.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CSSX5E.MI achieves a 9.31% return, which is significantly lower than SWDA.L's 11.28% return. Over the past 10 years, CSSX5E.MI has underperformed SWDA.L with an annualized return of 11.32%, while SWDA.L has yielded a comparatively higher 13.07% annualized return.
CSSX5E.MI
- 1D
- 0.77%
- 1M
- 7.33%
- YTD
- 9.31%
- 6M
- 10.49%
- 1Y
- 20.75%
- 3Y*
- 15.51%
- 5Y*
- 11.68%
- 10Y*
- 11.32%
SWDA.L
- 1D
- 1.15%
- 1M
- 2.64%
- YTD
- 11.28%
- 6M
- 12.42%
- 1Y
- 25.22%
- 3Y*
- 17.18%
- 5Y*
- 12.61%
- 10Y*
- 13.07%
CSSX5E.MI vs. SWDA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSSX5E.MI iShares Core EURO STOXX 50 ETF EUR Acc | 9.31% | 23.04% | 10.93% | 22.79% | -9.22% | 23.62% | -2.24% | 29.02% | -11.96% | 9.95% |
SWDA.L iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 11.28% | 6.76% | 26.95% | 20.08% | -13.06% | 31.68% | 6.15% | 30.86% | -4.97% | 7.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between CSSX5E.MI and SWDA.L is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 9, 2010 | 0.66 |
The correlation between CSSX5E.MI and SWDA.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CSSX5E.MI vs. SWDA.L — Risk / Return Rank
CSSX5E.MI
SWDA.L
CSSX5E.MI vs. SWDA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core EURO STOXX 50 ETF EUR Acc (CSSX5E.MI) and iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SWDA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CSSX5E.MI | SWDA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.97 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.42 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.92 | 3.84 | -1.92 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.58 | 15.58 | -9.00 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CSSX5E.MI vs. SWDA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSSX5E.MI drawdown since its inception was -38.50%, smaller than the maximum SWDA.L drawdown of -41.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSSX5E.MI and SWDA.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSSX5E.MI | SWDA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.50% | -41.36% | +2.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.81% | -6.53% | -4.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.36% | -20.55% | +4.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.56% | -20.55% | -3.01% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.50% | -33.00% | -5.50% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.08% | +0.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.26% | -8.77% | +1.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.15% | 1.61% | +1.54% |
Volatility
CSSX5E.MI vs. SWDA.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares Core EURO STOXX 50 ETF EUR Acc (CSSX5E.MI) has a higher volatility of 4.33% compared to iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SWDA.L) at 2.96%. This indicates that CSSX5E.MI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SWDA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CSSX5E.MI | SWDA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.33% | 2.96% | +1.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.15% | 7.93% | +5.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.07% | 11.12% | +4.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.63% | 14.11% | +3.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.32% | 15.25% | +3.07% |
CSSX5E.MI vs. SWDA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
CSSX5E.MI has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than SWDA.L's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
CSSX5E.MI vs. SWDA.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither CSSX5E.MI nor SWDA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CSSX5E.MI and SWDA.L have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CSSX5E.MI is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CSSX5E.MI is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for SWDA.L.
CSSX5E.MI is categorized as Europe Equities, while SWDA.L is Global Equities. CSSX5E.MI tracks EURO STOXX® 50, while SWDA.L tracks MSCI World Index. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for CSSX5E.MI and 0.20% for SWDA.L.
Find the right allocation for CSSX5E.MI and SWDA.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer