CSSX5E.MI vs. ICGA.DE
CSSX5E.MI (iShares Core EURO STOXX 50 ETF EUR Acc) and ICGA.DE (iShares MSCI China UCITS ETF USD Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - CSSX5E.MI is a Europe Equities fund tracking the EURO STOXX® 50, while ICGA.DE is a China Equities fund tracking the MSCI China. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CSSX5E.MI returned 11.68%/yr vs -3.91%/yr for ICGA.DE. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CSSX5E.MI charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.28%/yr for ICGA.DE.
Performance
CSSX5E.MI vs. ICGA.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CSSX5E.MI achieves a 9.31% return, which is significantly higher than ICGA.DE's -7.21% return.
CSSX5E.MI
- 1D
- 0.77%
- 1M
- 7.33%
- YTD
- 9.31%
- 6M
- 10.49%
- 1Y
- 20.75%
- 3Y*
- 15.51%
- 5Y*
- 11.68%
- 10Y*
- 11.32%
ICGA.DE
- 1D
- 1.03%
- 1M
- -2.20%
- YTD
- -7.21%
- 6M
- -6.68%
- 1Y
- 3.16%
- 3Y*
- 6.05%
- 5Y*
- -3.91%
- 10Y*
- —
CSSX5E.MI vs. ICGA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSSX5E.MI iShares Core EURO STOXX 50 ETF EUR Acc | 9.31% | 23.04% | 10.93% | 22.79% | -9.22% | 23.62% | -2.24% | 8.63% |
ICGA.DE iShares MSCI China UCITS ETF USD Acc | -7.21% | 16.59% | 27.32% | -14.87% | -15.07% | -17.34% | 15.34% | 14.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between CSSX5E.MI and ICGA.DE is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2019 | 0.43 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CSSX5E.MI vs. ICGA.DE — Risk / Return Rank
CSSX5E.MI
ICGA.DE
CSSX5E.MI vs. ICGA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core EURO STOXX 50 ETF EUR Acc (CSSX5E.MI) and iShares MSCI China UCITS ETF USD Acc (ICGA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CSSX5E.MI | ICGA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.04 | +0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.92 | 0.18 | +1.74 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.58 | 0.37 | +6.21 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CSSX5E.MI vs. ICGA.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSSX5E.MI drawdown since its inception was -38.50%, smaller than the maximum ICGA.DE drawdown of -55.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSSX5E.MI and ICGA.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSSX5E.MI | ICGA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.50% | -55.91% | +17.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.81% | -17.50% | +6.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.36% | -24.29% | +7.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.56% | -49.29% | +25.73% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.50% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -32.83% | +32.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.26% | -28.78% | +21.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.15% | 8.47% | -5.32% |
Volatility
CSSX5E.MI vs. ICGA.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Core EURO STOXX 50 ETF EUR Acc (CSSX5E.MI) is 4.33%, while iShares MSCI China UCITS ETF USD Acc (ICGA.DE) has a volatility of 6.02%. This indicates that CSSX5E.MI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ICGA.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CSSX5E.MI | ICGA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.33% | 6.02% | -1.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.15% | 13.75% | -0.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.07% | 18.96% | -2.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.63% | 27.79% | -10.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.32% | 27.05% | -8.73% |
CSSX5E.MI vs. ICGA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
CSSX5E.MI has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than ICGA.DE's 0.28% expense ratio.
Dividends
CSSX5E.MI vs. ICGA.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither CSSX5E.MI nor ICGA.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CSSX5E.MI and ICGA.DE have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CSSX5E.MI is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CSSX5E.MI is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for ICGA.DE.
CSSX5E.MI is categorized as Europe Equities, while ICGA.DE is China Equities. CSSX5E.MI tracks EURO STOXX® 50, while ICGA.DE tracks MSCI China. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for CSSX5E.MI and 0.28% for ICGA.DE.
Find the right allocation for CSSX5E.MI and ICGA.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer