CSSPX vs. VRTPX
CSSPX (Cohen & Steers Global Realty Shares, Inc.) and VRTPX (Vanguard Real Estate II Index Fund) are both REIT funds. Over the past 5 years, CSSPX returned 1.29%/yr vs 2.05%/yr for VRTPX. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CSSPX charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for VRTPX.
Performance
CSSPX vs. VRTPX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CSSPX achieves a 6.71% return, which is significantly lower than VRTPX's 8.00% return.
CSSPX
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- -2.35%
- YTD
- 6.71%
- 6M
- 6.31%
- 1Y
- 11.23%
- 3Y*
- 8.81%
- 5Y*
- 1.29%
- 10Y*
- 5.07%
VRTPX
- 1D
- 0.49%
- 1M
- -0.91%
- YTD
- 8.00%
- 6M
- 6.94%
- 1Y
- 10.19%
- 3Y*
- 8.88%
- 5Y*
- 2.05%
- 10Y*
- —
CSSPX vs. VRTPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSSPX Cohen & Steers Global Realty Shares, Inc. | 6.71% | 10.61% | 0.84% | 10.75% | -25.08% | 26.46% | -2.35% | 24.80% | -3.86% | 3.93% |
VRTPX Vanguard Real Estate II Index Fund | 8.00% | 2.22% | 3.72% | 13.17% | -26.14% | 40.37% | -4.65% | 28.96% | -5.99% | 1.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between CSSPX and VRTPX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2017 | 0.91 |
The correlation between CSSPX and VRTPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CSSPX vs. VRTPX — Risk / Return Rank
CSSPX
VRTPX
CSSPX vs. VRTPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cohen & Steers Global Realty Shares, Inc. (CSSPX) and Vanguard Real Estate II Index Fund (VRTPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CSSPX | VRTPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.14 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.08 | 1.20 | -0.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.07 | 3.78 | +0.30 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CSSPX | VRTPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 | 0.76 | +0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.08 | 0.11 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.30 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.36 | 0.25 | +0.11 |
Drawdowns
CSSPX vs. VRTPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSSPX drawdown since its inception was -40.47%, roughly equal to the maximum VRTPX drawdown of -42.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSSPX and VRTPX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSSPX | VRTPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.47% | -42.33% | +1.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.05% | -8.34% | -1.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.16% | -18.19% | +0.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.72% | -34.35% | +1.63% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.47% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.98% | -4.29% | +0.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.39% | -11.40% | +3.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.64% | 2.64% | 0.00% |
Volatility
CSSPX vs. VRTPX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Cohen & Steers Global Realty Shares, Inc. (CSSPX) is 3.51%, while Vanguard Real Estate II Index Fund (VRTPX) has a volatility of 3.79%. This indicates that CSSPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VRTPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CSSPX | VRTPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.51% | 3.79% | -0.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.94% | 9.34% | -0.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.66% | 13.15% | -1.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.94% | 18.89% | -2.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.03% | 21.79% | -4.76% |
CSSPX vs. VRTPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CSSPX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than VRTPX's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
CSSPX vs. VRTPX - Dividend Comparison
CSSPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.24%, less than VRTPX's 3.61% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSSPX Cohen & Steers Global Realty Shares, Inc. | 3.24% | 3.46% | 2.78% | 2.85% | 3.02% | 3.21% | 2.41% | 8.61% | 3.95% | 2.79% | 6.89% | 2.68% |
VRTPX Vanguard Real Estate II Index Fund | 3.61% | 2.79% | 3.80% | 3.93% | 4.52% | 2.58% | 3.92% | 3.50% | 4.77% | 1.32% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, CSSPX and VRTPX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
VRTPX has higher volatility (3.79%) compared to CSSPX (3.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CSSPX dropped -40.47% vs VRTPX's -42.33%.
CSSPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.93 vs 0.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CSSPX and VRTPX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer