PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CSSPX vs. PRCOX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CSSPX vs. PRCOX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cohen & Steers Global Realty Shares, Inc. (CSSPX) and T. Rowe Price U.S. Equity Research Fund (PRCOX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSSPX achieves a 10.41% return, which is significantly lower than PRCOX's 11.48% return. Over the past 10 years, CSSPX has underperformed PRCOX with an annualized return of 5.09%, while PRCOX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.83% annualized return.


CSSPX

1D
0.30%
1M
0.70%
6M
7.26%
YTD
10.41%
1Y
13.96%
3Y*
8.42%
5Y*
1.58%
10Y*
5.09%

PRCOX

1D
0.40%
1M
0.67%
6M
9.93%
YTD
11.48%
1Y
22.08%
3Y*
20.84%
5Y*
13.85%
10Y*
15.83%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CSSPX vs. PRCOX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CSSPX
Cohen & Steers Global Realty Shares, Inc.
10.41%10.61%0.84%10.75%-25.08%26.46%-2.35%24.80%-3.86%12.95%
PRCOX
T. Rowe Price U.S. Equity Research Fund
11.48%16.34%26.41%29.82%-18.80%28.06%19.82%33.04%-4.73%23.80%

Correlation

The correlation between CSSPX and PRCOX is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.48

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2014

0.61

Over the past year, the correlation between CSSPX and PRCOX has dropped to 0.28 - well below their long-term average of 0.61, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CSSPX vs. PRCOX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CSSPX
CSSPX Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
CSSPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSSPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSSPX Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
CSSPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSSPX Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

PRCOX
PRCOX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
PRCOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRCOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRCOX Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
PRCOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRCOX Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CSSPX vs. PRCOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cohen & Steers Global Realty Shares, Inc. (CSSPX) and T. Rowe Price U.S. Equity Research Fund (PRCOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CSSPXPRCOXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.78

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.32

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.45

2.43

-0.98

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.35

10.72

-5.37

CSSPX vs. PRCOX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSSPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.21, which is lower than the PRCOX Sharpe Ratio of 1.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSSPX and PRCOX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CSSPX vs. PRCOX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSSPX drawdown since its inception was -40.47%, smaller than the maximum PRCOX drawdown of -53.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSSPX and PRCOX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CSSPXPRCOXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.47%

-53.96%

+13.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.05%

-9.32%

-0.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.16%

-19.39%

+1.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.72%

-24.94%

-7.78%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.47%

-34.42%

-6.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.65%

-0.53%

-0.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.32%

-9.15%

+0.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.72%

2.10%

+0.62%

Volatility

CSSPX vs. PRCOX - Volatility Comparison

Cohen & Steers Global Realty Shares, Inc. (CSSPX) and T. Rowe Price U.S. Equity Research Fund (PRCOX) have volatilities of 3.80% and 3.97%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CSSPXPRCOXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.80%

3.97%

-0.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.66%

10.54%

-0.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.12%

12.78%

-0.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.95%

17.47%

-1.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.97%

18.34%

-1.37%

CSSPX vs. PRCOX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CSSPX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than PRCOX's 0.42% expense ratio.


Dividends

CSSPX vs. PRCOX - Dividend Comparison

CSSPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.15%, more than PRCOX's 1.05% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CSSPX
Cohen & Steers Global Realty Shares, Inc.
3.15%3.46%2.78%2.85%3.02%3.21%2.41%8.61%3.95%2.79%6.89%2.68%
PRCOX
T. Rowe Price U.S. Equity Research Fund
1.05%1.17%0.64%1.17%1.28%3.71%1.04%1.39%5.60%7.02%7.28%8.76%

Frequently Asked Questions


CSSPX and PRCOX have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PRCOX has higher volatility (3.97%) compared to CSSPX (3.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CSSPX dropped -40.47% vs PRCOX's -53.96%.

PRCOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs 1.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CSSPX and PRCOX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer