PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CSSPX vs. PHRAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CSSPX vs. PHRAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cohen & Steers Global Realty Shares, Inc. (CSSPX) and Virtus Duff & Phelps Real Estate Securities Fund (PHRAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSSPX achieves a 6.71% return, which is significantly lower than PHRAX's 11.63% return. Over the past 10 years, CSSPX has underperformed PHRAX with an annualized return of 5.07%, while PHRAX has yielded a comparatively higher 6.15% annualized return.


CSSPX

1D
0.24%
1M
-2.35%
YTD
6.71%
6M
6.31%
1Y
11.23%
3Y*
8.81%
5Y*
1.29%
10Y*
5.07%

PHRAX

1D
0.41%
1M
-1.30%
YTD
11.63%
6M
10.47%
1Y
11.41%
3Y*
10.12%
5Y*
3.87%
10Y*
6.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CSSPX vs. PHRAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CSSPX
Cohen & Steers Global Realty Shares, Inc.
6.71%10.61%0.84%10.75%-25.08%26.46%-2.35%24.80%-3.86%12.95%
PHRAX
Virtus Duff & Phelps Real Estate Securities Fund
11.63%0.23%10.15%10.98%-26.33%46.79%-1.98%27.09%-7.41%5.65%

Correlation

The correlation between CSSPX and PHRAX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2014

0.90

The correlation between CSSPX and PHRAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CSSPX vs. PHRAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CSSPX
CSSPX Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
CSSPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSSPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSSPX Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
CSSPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSSPX Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

PHRAX
PHRAX Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
PHRAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PHRAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
PHRAX Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
PHRAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
PHRAX Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CSSPX vs. PHRAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cohen & Steers Global Realty Shares, Inc. (CSSPX) and Virtus Duff & Phelps Real Estate Securities Fund (PHRAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CSSPXPHRAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.15

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.08

1.42

-0.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.07

4.15

-0.08

CSSPX vs. PHRAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSSPX Sharpe Ratio is 0.93, which is comparable to the PHRAX Sharpe Ratio of 0.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSSPX and PHRAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CSSPXPHRAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

0.85

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.08

0.20

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.30

0.29

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.36

0.40

-0.04

Drawdowns

CSSPX vs. PHRAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSSPX drawdown since its inception was -40.47%, smaller than the maximum PHRAX drawdown of -72.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSSPX and PHRAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CSSPXPHRAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.47%

-72.56%

+32.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.05%

-7.83%

-2.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.16%

-19.09%

+0.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.72%

-33.51%

+0.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.47%

-42.00%

+1.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.98%

-3.51%

-0.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.39%

-11.37%

+2.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.64%

2.67%

-0.03%

Volatility

CSSPX vs. PHRAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Cohen & Steers Global Realty Shares, Inc. (CSSPX) is 3.51%, while Virtus Duff & Phelps Real Estate Securities Fund (PHRAX) has a volatility of 3.94%. This indicates that CSSPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PHRAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CSSPXPHRAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.51%

3.94%

-0.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.94%

9.43%

-0.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.66%

13.12%

-1.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.94%

19.08%

-3.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.03%

20.98%

-3.95%

CSSPX vs. PHRAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CSSPX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is lower than PHRAX's 1.36% expense ratio.


Dividends

CSSPX vs. PHRAX - Dividend Comparison

CSSPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.24%, less than PHRAX's 5.30% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CSSPX
Cohen & Steers Global Realty Shares, Inc.
3.24%3.46%2.78%2.85%3.02%3.21%2.41%8.61%3.95%2.79%6.89%2.68%
PHRAX
Virtus Duff & Phelps Real Estate Securities Fund
5.30%5.93%8.39%12.35%11.12%4.45%5.58%21.34%19.03%18.54%21.22%20.04%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, CSSPX and PHRAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

PHRAX has higher volatility (3.94%) compared to CSSPX (3.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CSSPX dropped -40.47% vs PHRAX's -72.56%.

CSSPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.93 vs 0.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CSSPX and PHRAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer