CSSPX vs. FRINX
Compare and contrast key facts about Cohen & Steers Global Realty Shares, Inc. (CSSPX) and Fidelity Advisor Real Estate Income Fund Class A (FRINX).
CSSPX is managed by T. Rowe Price. It was launched on May 7, 1997. FRINX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Apr 14, 2010.
Performance
CSSPX vs. FRINX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CSSPX vs. FRINX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSSPX Cohen & Steers Global Realty Shares, Inc. | -0.28% | 10.61% | 0.84% | 10.75% | -25.08% | 26.46% | -2.35% | 24.80% | -3.86% | 12.95% |
FRINX Fidelity Advisor Real Estate Income Fund Class A | -0.08% | 6.87% | 7.61% | 9.01% | -14.79% | 18.64% | -1.36% | 17.52% | -1.93% | 6.00% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CSSPX achieves a -0.28% return, which is significantly lower than FRINX's -0.08% return. Over the past 10 years, CSSPX has underperformed FRINX with an annualized return of 4.51%, while FRINX has yielded a comparatively higher 5.00% annualized return.
CSSPX
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- -9.79%
- YTD
- -0.28%
- 6M
- -0.90%
- 1Y
- 8.52%
- 3Y*
- 6.71%
- 5Y*
- 2.06%
- 10Y*
- 4.51%
FRINX
- 1D
- 0.33%
- 1M
- -3.12%
- YTD
- -0.08%
- 6M
- 0.84%
- 1Y
- 4.05%
- 3Y*
- 7.09%
- 5Y*
- 3.61%
- 10Y*
- 5.00%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CSSPX vs. FRINX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CSSPX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is lower than FRINX's 0.98% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CSSPX vs. FRINX — Risk / Return Rank
CSSPX
FRINX
CSSPX vs. FRINX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cohen & Steers Global Realty Shares, Inc. (CSSPX) and Fidelity Advisor Real Estate Income Fund Class A (FRINX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CSSPX | FRINX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.63 | 0.86 | -0.23 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.94 | 1.16 | -0.22 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.17 | -0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.80 | 1.03 | -0.22 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.16 | 4.35 | -1.18 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CSSPX | FRINX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 | 0.86 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.13 | 0.56 | -0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.27 | 0.53 | -0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.33 | 0.75 | -0.42 |
Correlation
The correlation between CSSPX and FRINX is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
CSSPX vs. FRINX - Dividend Comparison
CSSPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.47%, less than FRINX's 4.40% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSSPX Cohen & Steers Global Realty Shares, Inc. | 3.47% | 3.46% | 2.78% | 2.85% | 3.02% | 3.21% | 2.41% | 8.61% | 3.95% | 2.79% | 6.89% | 2.68% |
FRINX Fidelity Advisor Real Estate Income Fund Class A | 4.40% | 4.40% | 4.41% | 4.78% | 5.80% | 1.31% | 4.53% | 5.45% | 4.89% | 4.21% | 4.77% | 3.53% |
Drawdowns
CSSPX vs. FRINX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSSPX drawdown since its inception was -40.47%, which is greater than FRINX's maximum drawdown of -34.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSSPX and FRINX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSSPX | FRINX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.47% | -34.50% | -5.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.29% | -4.28% | -6.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.72% | -18.30% | -14.42% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.47% | -34.50% | -5.97% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.79% | -3.12% | -6.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.47% | -3.41% | -5.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.61% | 1.01% | +1.60% |
Volatility
CSSPX vs. FRINX - Volatility Comparison
Cohen & Steers Global Realty Shares, Inc. (CSSPX) has a higher volatility of 4.06% compared to Fidelity Advisor Real Estate Income Fund Class A (FRINX) at 1.55%. This indicates that CSSPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FRINX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CSSPX | FRINX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.06% | 1.55% | +2.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.24% | 2.84% | +5.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.99% | 4.92% | +9.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.87% | 6.51% | +9.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.99% | 9.50% | +7.49% |