PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CSSPX vs. AIGYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CSSPX vs. AIGYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cohen & Steers Global Realty Shares, Inc. (CSSPX) and abrdn Realty Income & Growth Fund (AIGYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSSPX achieves a 6.38% return, which is significantly lower than AIGYX's 12.10% return. Over the past 10 years, CSSPX has underperformed AIGYX with an annualized return of 5.03%, while AIGYX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.07% annualized return.


CSSPX

1D
-0.31%
1M
-2.77%
YTD
6.38%
6M
6.36%
1Y
10.66%
3Y*
8.70%
5Y*
1.18%
10Y*
5.03%

AIGYX

1D
0.35%
1M
-1.96%
YTD
12.10%
6M
9.63%
1Y
16.42%
3Y*
11.91%
5Y*
8.11%
10Y*
8.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CSSPX vs. AIGYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CSSPX
Cohen & Steers Global Realty Shares, Inc.
6.38%10.61%0.84%10.75%-25.08%26.46%-2.35%24.80%-3.86%12.95%
AIGYX
abrdn Realty Income & Growth Fund
12.10%4.20%9.61%13.34%-24.99%62.09%-6.59%27.80%-7.59%8.52%

Correlation

The correlation between CSSPX and AIGYX is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2014

0.90

The correlation between CSSPX and AIGYX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CSSPX vs. AIGYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CSSPX
CSSPX Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
CSSPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSSPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSSPX Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
CSSPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSSPX Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

AIGYX
AIGYX Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
AIGYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AIGYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
AIGYX Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
AIGYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
AIGYX Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CSSPX vs. AIGYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cohen & Steers Global Realty Shares, Inc. (CSSPX) and abrdn Realty Income & Growth Fund (AIGYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CSSPXAIGYXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.23

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.09

2.17

-1.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.11

7.41

-3.29

CSSPX vs. AIGYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSSPX Sharpe Ratio is 0.94, which is comparable to the AIGYX Sharpe Ratio of 1.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSSPX and AIGYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CSSPXAIGYXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

1.29

-0.34

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.07

0.39

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.30

0.37

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.36

0.39

-0.03

Drawdowns

CSSPX vs. AIGYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSSPX drawdown since its inception was -40.47%, smaller than the maximum AIGYX drawdown of -79.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSSPX and AIGYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CSSPXAIGYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.47%

-79.94%

+39.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.05%

-7.71%

-2.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.16%

-18.26%

+0.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.72%

-31.20%

-1.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.47%

-43.10%

+2.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.27%

-3.84%

-0.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.39%

-12.42%

+4.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.66%

2.25%

+0.41%

Volatility

CSSPX vs. AIGYX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Cohen & Steers Global Realty Shares, Inc. (CSSPX) is 3.49%, while abrdn Realty Income & Growth Fund (AIGYX) has a volatility of 4.12%. This indicates that CSSPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AIGYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CSSPXAIGYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.49%

4.12%

-0.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.94%

9.61%

-0.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.66%

13.02%

-1.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.93%

20.71%

-4.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.03%

21.94%

-4.91%

CSSPX vs. AIGYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CSSPX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is lower than AIGYX's 1.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

CSSPX vs. AIGYX - Dividend Comparison

CSSPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.25%, less than AIGYX's 7.54% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AIGYX
abrdn Realty Income & Growth Fund
7.54%8.43%12.69%4.01%8.97%27.57%16.28%18.30%49.34%5.85%5.48%4.69%
CSSPX
Cohen & Steers Global Realty Shares, Inc.
3.25%3.46%2.78%2.85%3.02%3.21%2.41%8.61%3.95%2.79%6.89%2.68%

Frequently Asked Questions


CSSPX and AIGYX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AIGYX has higher volatility (4.12%) compared to CSSPX (3.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CSSPX dropped -40.47% vs AIGYX's -79.94%.

AIGYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.29 vs 0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CSSPX and AIGYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer