CSSPX.MI vs. EUNL.DE
CSSPX.MI (iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and EUNL.DE (iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - CSSPX.MI is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index, while EUNL.DE is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI World Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CSSPX.MI returned 14.96%/yr vs 12.82%/yr for EUNL.DE. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CSSPX.MI charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for EUNL.DE.
Performance
CSSPX.MI vs. EUNL.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with CSSPX.MI having a 11.35% return and EUNL.DE slightly lower at 10.86%. Over the past 10 years, CSSPX.MI has outperformed EUNL.DE with an annualized return of 14.96%, while EUNL.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 12.82% annualized return.
CSSPX.MI
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- 5.24%
- YTD
- 11.35%
- 6M
- 11.43%
- 1Y
- 25.64%
- 3Y*
- 18.86%
- 5Y*
- 14.77%
- 10Y*
- 14.96%
EUNL.DE
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 4.80%
- YTD
- 10.86%
- 6M
- 11.29%
- 1Y
- 23.80%
- 3Y*
- 17.55%
- 5Y*
- 12.89%
- 10Y*
- 12.82%
CSSPX.MI vs. EUNL.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSSPX.MI iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 11.35% | 4.27% | 33.76% | 22.03% | -14.58% | 40.89% | 7.57% | 34.27% | -1.05% | 6.71% |
EUNL.DE iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 10.86% | 7.90% | 25.93% | 20.13% | -13.59% | 32.71% | 5.48% | 31.34% | -5.13% | 7.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between CSSPX.MI and EUNL.DE is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2010 | 0.91 |
The correlation between CSSPX.MI and EUNL.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CSSPX.MI vs. EUNL.DE — Risk / Return Rank
CSSPX.MI
EUNL.DE
CSSPX.MI vs. EUNL.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSSPX.MI) and iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EUNL.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CSSPX.MI | EUNL.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.40 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.59 | 3.64 | -0.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.78 | 14.52 | -1.74 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CSSPX.MI | EUNL.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.24 | 2.12 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 | 0.90 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.92 | 0.84 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.93 | 0.82 | +0.11 |
Drawdowns
CSSPX.MI vs. EUNL.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSSPX.MI drawdown since its inception was -33.56%, roughly equal to the maximum EUNL.DE drawdown of -33.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSSPX.MI and EUNL.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSSPX.MI | EUNL.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.56% | -33.63% | +0.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.14% | -6.50% | -0.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.26% | -21.73% | -1.53% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.26% | -21.73% | -1.53% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.56% | -33.63% | +0.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.41% | -0.31% | -0.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.10% | -4.25% | +0.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.01% | 1.64% | +0.37% |
Volatility
CSSPX.MI vs. EUNL.DE - Volatility Comparison
iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSSPX.MI) and iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EUNL.DE) have volatilities of 2.65% and 2.62%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CSSPX.MI | EUNL.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.65% | 2.62% | +0.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.54% | 7.72% | -0.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.46% | 11.16% | +0.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.18% | 14.17% | +1.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.08% | 15.17% | +0.91% |
CSSPX.MI vs. EUNL.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
CSSPX.MI has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than EUNL.DE's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
CSSPX.MI vs. EUNL.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither CSSPX.MI nor EUNL.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, CSSPX.MI and EUNL.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, CSSPX.MI is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CSSPX.MI is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for EUNL.DE.
CSSPX.MI is categorized as S&P 500, while EUNL.DE is Global Equities. CSSPX.MI tracks S&P 500 Index, while EUNL.DE tracks MSCI World Index. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for CSSPX.MI and 0.20% for EUNL.DE.
Find the right allocation for CSSPX.MI and EUNL.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer