CSSPX.MI vs. CSP1.L
CSSPX.MI (iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and CSP1.L (iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF) are both S&P 500 funds from iShares tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CSSPX.MI returned 14.96%/yr vs 14.97%/yr for CSP1.L. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.07% expense ratio.
Performance
CSSPX.MI vs. CSP1.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
CSSPX.MI is traded in EUR, while CSP1.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the CSP1.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with CSSPX.MI having a 11.35% return and CSP1.L slightly higher at 11.53%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with CSSPX.MI having a 14.96% annualized return and CSP1.L not far ahead at 14.97%.
CSSPX.MI
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- 5.24%
- YTD
- 11.35%
- 6M
- 11.43%
- 1Y
- 25.64%
- 3Y*
- 18.86%
- 5Y*
- 14.77%
- 10Y*
- 14.96%
CSP1.L
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 5.34%
- YTD
- 11.53%
- 6M
- 11.59%
- 1Y
- 25.76%
- 3Y*
- 18.84%
- 5Y*
- 14.79%
- 10Y*
- 14.97%
CSSPX.MI vs. CSP1.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSSPX.MI iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 11.35% | 4.27% | 33.76% | 22.03% | -14.58% | 40.89% | 7.57% | 34.27% | -1.05% | 6.71% |
CSP1.L iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF | 11.53% | 3.67% | 33.49% | 22.33% | -13.74% | 39.60% | 7.48% | 34.46% | -1.22% | 6.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between CSSPX.MI and CSP1.L is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 21, 2010 | 0.85 |
The correlation between CSSPX.MI and CSP1.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.85 (all time) to 0.96 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CSSPX.MI vs. CSP1.L — Risk / Return Rank
CSSPX.MI
CSP1.L
CSSPX.MI vs. CSP1.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSSPX.MI) and iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF (CSP1.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CSSPX.MI | CSP1.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.42 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.59 | 3.58 | +0.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.78 | 12.98 | -0.20 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CSSPX.MI | CSP1.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.24 | 2.27 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 | 0.98 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.92 | 0.93 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.93 | 1.02 | -0.09 |
Drawdowns
CSSPX.MI vs. CSP1.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSSPX.MI drawdown since its inception was -33.56%, roughly equal to the maximum CSP1.L drawdown of -32.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSSPX.MI and CSP1.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSSPX.MI | CSP1.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.56% | -32.91% | -0.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.14% | -7.17% | +0.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.26% | -22.35% | -0.91% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.26% | -22.35% | -0.91% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.56% | -32.91% | -0.65% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.41% | -0.41% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.10% | -4.11% | +0.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.01% | 1.98% | +0.03% |
Volatility
CSSPX.MI vs. CSP1.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSSPX.MI) has a higher volatility of 2.65% compared to iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF (CSP1.L) at 2.16%. This indicates that CSSPX.MI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSP1.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CSSPX.MI | CSP1.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.65% | 2.16% | +0.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.54% | 7.40% | +0.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.46% | 11.29% | +0.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.18% | 15.06% | +0.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.08% | 16.08% | 0.00% |
CSSPX.MI vs. CSP1.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both CSSPX.MI and CSP1.L have an expense ratio of 0.07%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
CSSPX.MI vs. CSP1.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither CSSPX.MI nor CSP1.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, CSSPX.MI and CSP1.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
Both ETFs have the same 0.07% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CSSPX.MI and CSP1.L have the same expense ratio: 0.07% per year.
Both ETFs track S&P 500 Index.
Find the right allocation for CSSPX.MI and CSP1.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer