PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CSRIX vs. PURZX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CSRIX vs. PURZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cohen & Steers Institutional Realty Shares (CSRIX) and PGIM Global Real Estate Fund (PURZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSRIX achieves a 11.61% return, which is significantly higher than PURZX's 8.43% return. Over the past 10 years, CSRIX has outperformed PURZX with an annualized return of 7.30%, while PURZX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.15% annualized return.


CSRIX

1D
0.40%
1M
-0.97%
YTD
11.61%
6M
10.52%
1Y
11.20%
3Y*
10.47%
5Y*
3.87%
10Y*
7.30%

PURZX

1D
0.36%
1M
-2.25%
YTD
8.43%
6M
7.58%
1Y
12.73%
3Y*
9.90%
5Y*
2.02%
10Y*
4.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CSRIX vs. PURZX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CSRIX
Cohen & Steers Institutional Realty Shares
11.61%3.10%6.26%12.75%-25.15%42.40%-2.55%36.11%-4.68%6.71%
PURZX
PGIM Global Real Estate Fund
8.43%9.22%3.64%11.24%-26.73%27.91%-4.39%20.60%-5.32%10.36%

Correlation

The correlation between CSRIX and PURZX is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2015

0.91

The correlation between CSRIX and PURZX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CSRIX vs. PURZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CSRIX
CSRIX Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
CSRIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSRIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSRIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
CSRIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSRIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

PURZX
PURZX Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
PURZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PURZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
PURZX Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
PURZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
PURZX Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CSRIX vs. PURZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cohen & Steers Institutional Realty Shares (CSRIX) and PGIM Global Real Estate Fund (PURZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CSRIXPURZXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.18

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.40

1.20

+0.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.70

4.46

-0.76

CSRIX vs. PURZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSRIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.81, which is comparable to the PURZX Sharpe Ratio of 1.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSRIX and PURZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CSRIXPURZXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

1.01

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

0.12

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.36

0.24

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.35

0.37

-0.02

Drawdowns

CSRIX vs. PURZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSRIX drawdown since its inception was -41.45%, smaller than the maximum PURZX drawdown of -69.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSRIX and PURZX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CSRIXPURZXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.45%

-69.49%

+28.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.74%

-10.16%

+2.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.89%

-18.57%

+1.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.79%

-34.80%

+3.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.45%

-41.05%

-0.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.89%

-3.95%

+1.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.80%

-11.98%

+3.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.92%

2.72%

+0.20%

Volatility

CSRIX vs. PURZX - Volatility Comparison

Cohen & Steers Institutional Realty Shares (CSRIX) and PGIM Global Real Estate Fund (PURZX) have volatilities of 3.71% and 3.60%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CSRIXPURZXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.71%

3.60%

+0.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.13%

9.16%

+0.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.45%

12.10%

+1.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.59%

16.35%

+2.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.49%

17.28%

+3.21%

CSRIX vs. PURZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CSRIX has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is lower than PURZX's 0.93% expense ratio.


Dividends

CSRIX vs. PURZX - Dividend Comparison

CSRIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.87%, more than PURZX's 2.76% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CSRIX
Cohen & Steers Institutional Realty Shares
2.87%3.14%2.97%3.04%4.28%3.87%4.91%12.97%5.45%6.28%12.61%13.63%
PURZX
PGIM Global Real Estate Fund
2.76%2.85%2.68%2.27%2.22%16.92%1.71%10.18%4.22%3.93%4.67%3.45%

Frequently Asked Questions


CSRIX and PURZX have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CSRIX has higher volatility (3.71%) compared to PURZX (3.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CSRIX dropped -41.45% vs PURZX's -69.49%.

PURZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.01 vs 0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CSRIX and PURZX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer