CSQAX vs. FCRIX
CSQAX (Credit Suisse Multialternative Strategy Fund Class A Shares) and FCRIX (FS Credit Income Fund Class I) are both Multistrategy funds. CSQAX is passively managed, while FCRIX is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, CSQAX returned 3.20%/yr vs 4.50%/yr for FCRIX. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CSQAX charges 1.74%/yr vs 2.37%/yr for FCRIX.
Performance
CSQAX vs. FCRIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CSQAX achieves a 4.50% return, which is significantly higher than FCRIX's 2.90% return.
CSQAX
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- -0.23%
- YTD
- 4.50%
- 6M
- 3.73%
- 1Y
- 3.67%
- 3Y*
- 4.29%
- 5Y*
- 3.20%
- 10Y*
- 3.41%
FCRIX
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 0.76%
- YTD
- 2.90%
- 6M
- 3.68%
- 1Y
- 8.18%
- 3Y*
- 9.15%
- 5Y*
- 4.50%
- 10Y*
- —
CSQAX vs. FCRIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSQAX Credit Suisse Multialternative Strategy Fund Class A Shares | 4.50% | 0.73% | 0.66% | 1.72% | 5.52% | 9.98% | 6.10% | -1.78% |
FCRIX FS Credit Income Fund Class I | 2.90% | 7.88% | 9.57% | 11.96% | -10.70% | 7.50% | 8.27% | 2.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between CSQAX and FCRIX is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 12, 2019 | 0.08 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CSQAX vs. FCRIX — Risk / Return Rank
CSQAX
FCRIX
CSQAX vs. FCRIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Credit Suisse Multialternative Strategy Fund Class A Shares (CSQAX) and FS Credit Income Fund Class I (FCRIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CSQAX | FCRIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -11.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 2.87 | -1.78 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.77 | 9.15 | -8.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.94 | 40.39 | -38.45 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CSQAX | FCRIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 | 2.75 | -2.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 | 1.07 | -0.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 0.87 | -0.34 |
Drawdowns
CSQAX vs. FCRIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSQAX drawdown since its inception was -8.37%, smaller than the maximum FCRIX drawdown of -26.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSQAX and FCRIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSQAX | FCRIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.37% | -26.74% | +18.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.92% | -0.90% | -4.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.27% | -3.01% | -2.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -7.28% | -15.33% | +8.05% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -8.37% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.34% | 0.00% | -1.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.07% | -3.20% | +1.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.96% | 0.20% | +1.76% |
Volatility
CSQAX vs. FCRIX - Volatility Comparison
Credit Suisse Multialternative Strategy Fund Class A Shares (CSQAX) has a higher volatility of 1.90% compared to FS Credit Income Fund Class I (FCRIX) at 0.68%. This indicates that CSQAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FCRIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CSQAX | FCRIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.90% | 0.68% | +1.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.60% | 2.07% | +3.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.24% | 3.00% | +4.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.32% | 4.22% | +2.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.03% | 6.41% | -0.38% |
CSQAX vs. FCRIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CSQAX has a 1.74% expense ratio, which is lower than FCRIX's 2.37% expense ratio.
Dividends
CSQAX vs. FCRIX - Dividend Comparison
CSQAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%, less than FCRIX's 10.10% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSQAX Credit Suisse Multialternative Strategy Fund Class A Shares | 1.04% | 1.09% | 6.54% | 2.73% | 2.59% | 9.06% | 13.23% | 4.77% | 1.84% | 5.27% | 1.87% | 0.24% |
FCRIX FS Credit Income Fund Class I | 10.10% | 10.54% | 8.27% | 5.56% | 3.25% | 5.62% | 5.72% | 2.91% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CSQAX and FCRIX have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CSQAX has higher volatility (1.90%) compared to FCRIX (0.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CSQAX dropped -8.37% vs FCRIX's -26.74%.
FCRIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.75 vs 0.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CSQAX and FCRIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer