CSPX.L vs. VWRA.L
CSPX.L (iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and VWRA.L (Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulating) are both exchange-traded funds - CSPX.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index, while VWRA.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE All-World Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CSPX.L returned 13.72%/yr vs 11.25%/yr for VWRA.L. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. CSPX.L charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.22%/yr for VWRA.L.
Performance
CSPX.L vs. VWRA.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CSPX.L achieves a 10.32% return, which is significantly lower than VWRA.L's 11.59% return.
CSPX.L
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 4.51%
- YTD
- 10.32%
- 6M
- 11.15%
- 1Y
- 27.85%
- 3Y*
- 22.17%
- 5Y*
- 13.72%
- 10Y*
- 15.22%
VWRA.L
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- 4.27%
- YTD
- 11.59%
- 6M
- 13.04%
- 1Y
- 28.67%
- 3Y*
- 21.09%
- 5Y*
- 11.25%
- 10Y*
- —
CSPX.L vs. VWRA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSPX.L iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 10.32% | 17.45% | 25.25% | 26.74% | -18.72% | 29.35% | 17.62% | 7.43% |
VWRA.L Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulating | 11.59% | 22.45% | 17.65% | 22.28% | -18.11% | 18.46% | 16.19% | 7.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between CSPX.L and VWRA.L is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 29, 2019 | 0.95 |
The correlation between CSPX.L and VWRA.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
CSPX.L vs. VWRA.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CSPX.L
VWRA.L
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
CSPX.L
VWRA.L
Financial Services
CSPX.L
VWRA.L
Communication Services
CSPX.L
VWRA.L
Consumer Cyclical
CSPX.L
VWRA.L
Healthcare
CSPX.L
VWRA.L
Industrials
CSPX.L
VWRA.L
Consumer Defensive
CSPX.L
VWRA.L
Energy
CSPX.L
VWRA.L
Utilities
CSPX.L
VWRA.L
Real Estate
CSPX.L
VWRA.L
Basic Materials
CSPX.L
VWRA.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CSPX.L vs. VWRA.L — Risk / Return Rank
CSPX.L
VWRA.L
CSPX.L vs. VWRA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSPX.L) and Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (VWRA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CSPX.L | VWRA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.43 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.35 | 3.25 | +0.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.51 | 13.63 | +0.88 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CSPX.L | VWRA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.32 | 2.31 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 | 0.73 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.94 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.94 | 0.78 | +0.16 |
Drawdowns
CSPX.L vs. VWRA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSPX.L drawdown since its inception was -33.90%, roughly equal to the maximum VWRA.L drawdown of -33.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSPX.L and VWRA.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSPX.L | VWRA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.90% | -33.62% | -0.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.17% | -8.78% | +0.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.50% | -16.26% | -2.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.39% | -26.06% | +1.67% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.90% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.53% | -0.75% | +0.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.72% | -5.39% | +1.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.90% | 2.10% | -0.20% |
Volatility
CSPX.L vs. VWRA.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSPX.L) is 3.13%, while Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (VWRA.L) has a volatility of 3.87%. This indicates that CSPX.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VWRA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CSPX.L | VWRA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.13% | 3.87% | -0.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.70% | 9.78% | -1.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.80% | 12.36% | -0.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.97% | 15.36% | +0.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.19% | 17.28% | -1.09% |
CSPX.L vs. VWRA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
CSPX.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than VWRA.L's 0.22% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
CSPX.L vs. VWRA.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither CSPX.L nor VWRA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, CSPX.L and VWRA.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, CSPX.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CSPX.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for VWRA.L.
CSPX.L is categorized as S&P 500, while VWRA.L is Global Equities. CSPX.L tracks S&P 500 Index, while VWRA.L tracks FTSE All-World Index. They also come from different issuers: BlackRock and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for CSPX.L and 0.22% for VWRA.L.
Find the right allocation for CSPX.L and VWRA.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer