PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
CSPX.L vs. UC13.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

CSPX.L vs. UC13.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

CSPX.L (iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and UC13.L (UBS Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD dis) are both S&P 500 funds tracking the S&P 500 Index, from BlackRock and UBS respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CSPX.L returned 15.22%/yr vs 13.67%/yr for UC13.L. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CSPX.L charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for UC13.L.

Performance

CSPX.L vs. UC13.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSPX.L) and UBS Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD dis (UC13.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

CSPX.L is traded in USD, while UC13.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the UC13.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSPX.L achieves a 10.32% return, which is significantly higher than UC13.L's 9.66% return. Over the past 10 years, CSPX.L has outperformed UC13.L with an annualized return of 15.22%, while UC13.L has yielded a comparatively lower 13.67% annualized return.

CSPX.L

1D
0.01%
1M
4.51%
YTD
10.32%
6M
11.15%
1Y
27.85%
3Y*
22.17%
5Y*
13.72%
10Y*
15.22%

UC13.L

1D
0.03%
1M
4.62%
YTD
9.66%
6M
10.64%
1Y
26.62%
3Y*
20.73%
5Y*
12.42%
10Y*
13.67%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CSPX.L vs. UC13.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CSPX.L
iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc)		10.32%17.45%25.25%26.74%-18.72%29.35%17.62%30.55%-5.46%21.60%
UC13.L
UBS Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD dis		9.66%16.57%23.67%24.37%-19.63%28.29%15.23%29.41%-7.09%19.35%

Correlation

The correlation between CSPX.L and UC13.L is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 2013

0.90

The correlation between CSPX.L and UC13.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

CSPX.L vs. UC13.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
CSPX.L
UC13.L

Technology

38.2%
37.9%

Financial Services

11.1%
11.3%

Communication Services

10.9%
10.9%

Consumer Cyclical

10.0%
9.8%

Healthcare

8.3%
8.3%

Industrials

7.9%
7.8%

Consumer Defensive

4.7%
4.8%

Energy

3.2%
3.4%

Utilities

2.2%
2.2%

Real Estate

1.9%
1.9%

Basic Materials

1.7%
1.7%

Technology

CSPX.L
38.2%
UC13.L
37.9%

Financial Services

CSPX.L
11.1%
UC13.L
11.3%

Communication Services

CSPX.L
10.9%
UC13.L
10.9%

Consumer Cyclical

CSPX.L
10.0%
UC13.L
9.8%

Healthcare

CSPX.L
8.3%
UC13.L
8.3%

Industrials

CSPX.L
7.9%
UC13.L
7.8%

Consumer Defensive

CSPX.L
4.7%
UC13.L
4.8%

Energy

CSPX.L
3.2%
UC13.L
3.4%

Utilities

CSPX.L
2.2%
UC13.L
2.2%

Real Estate

CSPX.L
1.9%
UC13.L
1.9%

Basic Materials

CSPX.L
1.7%
UC13.L
1.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc)

UBS Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD dis

Often compared with CSPX.L:
CSPX.L vs. VOOCSPX.L vs. VUAA.LCSPX.L vs. SPYCSPX.L vs. CSPX.ASCSPX.L vs. CSP1.LCSPX.L vs. VWRL.ASCSPX.L vs. IVV
Often compared with UC13.L:
UC13.L vs. VUSA.LUC13.L vs. VOOUC13.L vs. SPXP.LUC13.L vs. SPYUC13.L vs. XDPG.LUC13.L vs. I500.LUC13.L vs. VUAA.L

Return for Risk

CSPX.L vs. UC13.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
CSPX.L
CSPX.L Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
CSPX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSPX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSPX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
CSPX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSPX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
UC13.L
UC13.L Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
UC13.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UC13.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
UC13.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
UC13.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
UC13.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CSPX.L vs. UC13.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSPX.L) and UBS Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD dis (UC13.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

CSPX.LUC13.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.32
2.40

-0.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.41
3.47

-0.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.43

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.35

2.81

+0.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.51

11.87

+2.64

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CSPX.L vs. UC13.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSPX.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.32, which is comparable to the UC13.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSPX.L and UC13.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

CSPX.LUC13.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.32

2.40

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

0.79

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

0.85

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.94

0.80

+0.14

Drawdowns

CSPX.L vs. UC13.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSPX.L drawdown since its inception was -33.90%, roughly equal to the maximum UC13.L drawdown of -33.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSPX.L and UC13.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

CSPX.LUC13.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.90%

-33.60%

-0.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.17%

-9.42%

+1.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.50%

-19.27%

+0.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.39%

-26.03%

+1.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.90%

-33.60%

-0.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.53%

-0.55%

+0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.72%

-4.24%

+0.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.90%

2.24%

-0.34%

Volatility

CSPX.L vs. UC13.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSPX.L) has a higher volatility of 3.13% compared to UBS Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD dis (UC13.L) at 2.59%. This indicates that CSPX.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UC13.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

CSPX.LUC13.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.13%

2.59%

+0.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.70%

7.91%

+0.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.80%

11.05%

+0.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.97%

15.72%

+0.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.19%

16.23%

-0.04%

CSPX.L vs. UC13.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

CSPX.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is higher than UC13.L's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

CSPX.L vs. UC13.L - Dividend Comparison

CSPX.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while UC13.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CSPX.L
iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc)		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UC13.L
UBS Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD dis		0.01%0.01%0.01%0.01%0.01%0.01%0.01%0.01%0.02%0.02%0.02%0.02%

Frequently Asked Questions

CSPX.L and UC13.L have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, UC13.L is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

UC13.L is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for CSPX.L.

Both ETFs track S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: BlackRock and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for CSPX.L and 0.03% for UC13.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CSPX.L and UC13.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer