PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CSPX.L vs. UBER
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CSPX.L vs. UBER - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSPX.L) and Uber Technologies, Inc. (UBER). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSPX.L achieves a 8.40% return, which is significantly higher than UBER's -15.74% return.


CSPX.L

1D
2.02%
1M
-0.83%
YTD
8.40%
6M
9.68%
1Y
24.86%
3Y*
20.75%
5Y*
13.23%
10Y*
15.24%

UBER

1D
-1.01%
1M
-7.82%
YTD
-15.74%
6M
-19.10%
1Y
-17.97%
3Y*
18.47%
5Y*
6.60%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CSPX.L vs. UBER - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
CSPX.L
iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
8.40%17.45%25.25%26.74%-18.72%29.35%17.62%14.62%
UBER
Uber Technologies, Inc.
-15.74%35.46%-2.03%148.97%-41.02%-17.78%71.49%-29.19%

Correlation

The correlation between CSPX.L and UBER is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.25

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2019

0.30

The correlation between CSPX.L and UBER shifts across timeframes, from 0.21 (1 year) to 0.32 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CSPX.L vs. UBER — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CSPX.L
CSPX.L Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
CSPX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSPX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSPX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
CSPX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSPX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

UBER
UBER Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
UBER Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UBER Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
UBER Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
UBER Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
UBER Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CSPX.L vs. UBER - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSPX.L) and Uber Technologies, Inc. (UBER). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CSPX.LUBERDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

0.92

+0.45

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.98

-0.62

+3.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.45

-1.09

+13.54

CSPX.L vs. UBER - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSPX.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.03, which is higher than the UBER Sharpe Ratio of -0.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSPX.L and UBER, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CSPX.L vs. UBER - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSPX.L drawdown since its inception was -33.90%, smaller than the maximum UBER drawdown of -68.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSPX.L and UBER.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CSPX.LUBERDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.90%

-68.05%

+34.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.17%

-31.46%

+23.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.50%

-31.46%

+12.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.39%

-60.45%

+36.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.27%

-31.22%

+28.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.72%

-25.67%

+21.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.96%

17.93%

-15.97%

Volatility

CSPX.L vs. UBER - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSPX.L) is 4.01%, while Uber Technologies, Inc. (UBER) has a volatility of 7.96%. This indicates that CSPX.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UBER based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CSPX.LUBERDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.01%

7.96%

-3.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.03%

23.21%

-14.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.04%

32.66%

-20.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.03%

44.82%

-28.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.22%

50.61%

-34.39%

Dividends

CSPX.L vs. UBER - Dividend Comparison

Neither CSPX.L nor UBER has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


CSPX.L and UBER have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CSPX.L and UBER

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer