CSPX.L vs. IUES.L
CSPX.L (iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and IUES.L (iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - CSPX.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index, while IUES.L is a Energy Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Energy NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CSPX.L returned 15.22%/yr vs 9.21%/yr for IUES.L. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CSPX.L charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for IUES.L.
Performance
CSPX.L vs. IUES.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CSPX.L achieves a 10.32% return, which is significantly lower than IUES.L's 30.45% return. Over the past 10 years, CSPX.L has outperformed IUES.L with an annualized return of 15.22%, while IUES.L has yielded a comparatively lower 9.21% annualized return.
CSPX.L
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 4.51%
- YTD
- 10.32%
- 6M
- 11.15%
- 1Y
- 27.85%
- 3Y*
- 22.17%
- 5Y*
- 13.72%
- 10Y*
- 15.22%
IUES.L
- 1D
- -0.36%
- 1M
- -1.09%
- YTD
- 30.45%
- 6M
- 29.22%
- 1Y
- 46.28%
- 3Y*
- 16.84%
- 5Y*
- 20.33%
- 10Y*
- 9.21%
CSPX.L vs. IUES.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSPX.L iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 10.32% | 17.45% | 25.25% | 26.74% | -18.72% | 29.35% | 17.62% | 30.55% | -5.46% | 21.60% |
IUES.L iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 30.45% | 9.82% | 3.87% | -0.63% | 63.84% | 51.95% | -33.35% | 8.81% | -18.12% | -1.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between CSPX.L and IUES.L is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 25, 2015 | 0.45 |
The correlation between CSPX.L and IUES.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.12 (1 year) to 0.45 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
CSPX.L vs. IUES.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CSPX.L
IUES.L
Technology
-
Financial Services
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Technology
CSPX.L
IUES.L
-
Financial Services
CSPX.L
IUES.L
-
Communication Services
CSPX.L
IUES.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
CSPX.L
IUES.L
-
Healthcare
CSPX.L
IUES.L
-
Industrials
CSPX.L
IUES.L
-
Consumer Defensive
CSPX.L
IUES.L
-
Energy
CSPX.L
IUES.L
Utilities
CSPX.L
IUES.L
-
Real Estate
CSPX.L
IUES.L
-
Basic Materials
CSPX.L
IUES.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CSPX.L vs. IUES.L — Risk / Return Rank
CSPX.L
IUES.L
CSPX.L vs. IUES.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSPX.L) and iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUES.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CSPX.L | IUES.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.77 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.35 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.35 | 3.18 | +0.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.51 | 9.97 | +4.54 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CSPX.L | IUES.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.32 | 2.12 | +0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 | 0.76 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.94 | 0.32 | +0.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.94 | 0.31 | +0.63 |
Drawdowns
CSPX.L vs. IUES.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSPX.L drawdown since its inception was -33.90%, smaller than the maximum IUES.L drawdown of -66.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSPX.L and IUES.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSPX.L | IUES.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.90% | -66.78% | +32.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.17% | -14.49% | +6.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.50% | -20.90% | +2.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.39% | -27.98% | +3.59% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.90% | -66.78% | +32.88% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.53% | -7.45% | +6.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.72% | -14.21% | +10.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.90% | 4.63% | -2.73% |
Volatility
CSPX.L vs. IUES.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSPX.L) is 3.13%, while iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUES.L) has a volatility of 8.13%. This indicates that CSPX.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IUES.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CSPX.L | IUES.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.13% | 8.13% | -5.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.70% | 18.58% | -9.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.80% | 21.81% | -10.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.97% | 26.72% | -10.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.19% | 28.49% | -12.30% |
CSPX.L vs. IUES.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
CSPX.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than IUES.L's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
CSPX.L vs. IUES.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither CSPX.L nor IUES.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CSPX.L and IUES.L have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CSPX.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CSPX.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for IUES.L.
CSPX.L is categorized as S&P 500, while IUES.L is Energy Equities. CSPX.L tracks S&P 500 Index, while IUES.L tracks MSCI World/Energy NR USD. They also come from different issuers: BlackRock and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for CSPX.L and 0.15% for IUES.L.
Find the right allocation for CSPX.L and IUES.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer