CSPX.AS vs. XDPP.L
CSPX.AS (iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF) and XDPP.L (Xtrackers S&P 500 UCITS ETF 4C) are both S&P 500 funds tracking the S&P 500 Index, from iShares and Xtrackers respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, CSPX.AS returned 18.87%/yr vs 18.85%/yr for XDPP.L. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CSPX.AS charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for XDPP.L.
Performance
CSPX.AS vs. XDPP.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
CSPX.AS is traded in EUR, while XDPP.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the XDPP.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with CSPX.AS having a 11.52% return and XDPP.L slightly higher at 11.56%.
CSPX.AS
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 5.25%
- YTD
- 11.52%
- 6M
- 11.45%
- 1Y
- 25.69%
- 3Y*
- 18.87%
- 5Y*
- 14.77%
- 10Y*
- 14.96%
XDPP.L
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- 5.30%
- YTD
- 11.56%
- 6M
- 11.59%
- 1Y
- 25.79%
- 3Y*
- 18.85%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CSPX.AS vs. XDPP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSPX.AS iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF | 11.52% | 4.00% | 33.87% | 22.28% | -0.68% |
XDPP.L Xtrackers S&P 500 UCITS ETF 4C | 11.56% | 3.73% | 33.40% | 22.34% | -0.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between CSPX.AS and XDPP.L is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2022 | 0.94 |
The correlation between CSPX.AS and XDPP.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CSPX.AS vs. XDPP.L — Risk / Return Rank
CSPX.AS
XDPP.L
CSPX.AS vs. XDPP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF (CSPX.AS) and Xtrackers S&P 500 UCITS ETF 4C (XDPP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CSPX.AS | XDPP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.43 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.57 | 3.57 | -0.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.76 | 12.94 | -0.18 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CSPX.AS | XDPP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.25 | 2.31 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.92 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.93 | 1.19 | -0.26 |
Drawdowns
CSPX.AS vs. XDPP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSPX.AS drawdown since its inception was -33.65%, which is greater than XDPP.L's maximum drawdown of -22.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSPX.AS and XDPP.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSPX.AS | XDPP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.65% | -22.63% | -11.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.11% | -7.19% | +0.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.37% | -22.63% | -0.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.37% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.65% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.40% | -0.41% | +0.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.28% | -4.37% | +0.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.00% | 1.99% | +0.01% |
Volatility
CSPX.AS vs. XDPP.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF (CSPX.AS) has a higher volatility of 2.59% compared to Xtrackers S&P 500 UCITS ETF 4C (XDPP.L) at 2.14%. This indicates that CSPX.AS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDPP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CSPX.AS | XDPP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.59% | 2.14% | +0.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.37% | 7.38% | -0.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.26% | 11.13% | +0.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.13% | 14.46% | +0.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.05% | 14.46% | +1.59% |
CSPX.AS vs. XDPP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
CSPX.AS has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is higher than XDPP.L's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
CSPX.AS vs. XDPP.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither CSPX.AS nor XDPP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, CSPX.AS and XDPP.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, XDPP.L is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XDPP.L is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for CSPX.AS.
Both ETFs track S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for CSPX.AS and 0.06% for XDPP.L.
Find the right allocation for CSPX.AS and XDPP.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer