CSPX.AS vs. LTAM.AS
CSPX.AS (iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF) and LTAM.AS (iShares MSCI EM Latin America UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) are both exchange-traded funds - CSPX.AS is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index, while LTAM.AS is a Latin America Equities fund tracking the MSCI EM Latin America NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CSPX.AS returned 15.02%/yr vs 7.16%/yr for LTAM.AS. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CSPX.AS charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for LTAM.AS.
Performance
CSPX.AS vs. LTAM.AS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with CSPX.AS having a 11.63% return and LTAM.AS slightly higher at 11.79%. Over the past 10 years, CSPX.AS has outperformed LTAM.AS with an annualized return of 15.02%, while LTAM.AS has yielded a comparatively lower 7.16% annualized return.
CSPX.AS
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- 6.08%
- YTD
- 11.63%
- 6M
- 11.61%
- 1Y
- 25.69%
- 3Y*
- 19.12%
- 5Y*
- 14.80%
- 10Y*
- 15.02%
LTAM.AS
- 1D
- -2.15%
- 1M
- -5.48%
- YTD
- 11.79%
- 6M
- 10.17%
- 1Y
- 34.82%
- 3Y*
- 10.51%
- 5Y*
- 9.37%
- 10Y*
- 7.16%
CSPX.AS vs. LTAM.AS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSPX.AS iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF | 11.63% | 4.00% | 33.87% | 22.28% | -14.24% | 40.26% | 7.72% | 32.99% | -0.36% | 7.13% |
LTAM.AS iShares MSCI EM Latin America UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 11.79% | 36.08% | -22.43% | 28.47% | 14.01% | -3.03% | -18.51% | 14.74% | -1.57% | 7.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between CSPX.AS and LTAM.AS is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 6, 2014 | 0.47 |
The correlation between CSPX.AS and LTAM.AS shifts across timeframes, from 0.35 (3 years) to 0.47 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CSPX.AS vs. LTAM.AS — Risk / Return Rank
CSPX.AS
LTAM.AS
CSPX.AS vs. LTAM.AS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF (CSPX.AS) and iShares MSCI EM Latin America UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (LTAM.AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CSPX.AS | LTAM.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.33 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.57 | 3.28 | +0.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.76 | 9.77 | +2.99 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CSPX.AS | LTAM.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.25 | 1.95 | +0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 | 0.44 | +0.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.92 | 0.28 | +0.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.93 | 0.07 | +0.86 |
Drawdowns
CSPX.AS vs. LTAM.AS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSPX.AS drawdown since its inception was -33.65%, smaller than the maximum LTAM.AS drawdown of -60.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSPX.AS and LTAM.AS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSPX.AS | LTAM.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.65% | -60.23% | +26.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.11% | -10.47% | +3.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.37% | -25.56% | +2.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.37% | -25.56% | +2.19% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.65% | -49.89% | +16.24% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.30% | -10.47% | +10.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.29% | -26.14% | +21.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.00% | 3.54% | -1.54% |
Volatility
CSPX.AS vs. LTAM.AS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF (CSPX.AS) is 2.64%, while iShares MSCI EM Latin America UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (LTAM.AS) has a volatility of 5.21%. This indicates that CSPX.AS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LTAM.AS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CSPX.AS | LTAM.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.64% | 5.21% | -2.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.37% | 14.94% | -7.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.36% | 17.63% | -6.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.13% | 20.78% | -5.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.05% | 25.09% | -9.04% |
CSPX.AS vs. LTAM.AS - Expense Ratio Comparison
CSPX.AS has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than LTAM.AS's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
CSPX.AS vs. LTAM.AS - Dividend Comparison
CSPX.AS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LTAM.AS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.00%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSPX.AS iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LTAM.AS iShares MSCI EM Latin America UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 3.00% | 3.21% | 5.22% | 3.99% | 6.79% | 2.66% | 1.65% | 2.11% | 1.84% | 1.41% | 1.23% | 2.69% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CSPX.AS and LTAM.AS have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CSPX.AS is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CSPX.AS is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for LTAM.AS.
CSPX.AS is categorized as S&P 500, while LTAM.AS is Latin America Equities. CSPX.AS tracks S&P 500 Index, while LTAM.AS tracks MSCI EM Latin America NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for CSPX.AS and 0.20% for LTAM.AS.
Find the right allocation for CSPX.AS and LTAM.AS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer