PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CSPX.AS vs. IWDA.AS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CSPX.AS vs. IWDA.AS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF (CSPX.AS) and iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IWDA.AS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with CSPX.AS having a 11.52% return and IWDA.AS slightly lower at 11.06%. Over the past 10 years, CSPX.AS has outperformed IWDA.AS with an annualized return of 14.96%, while IWDA.AS has yielded a comparatively lower 12.81% annualized return.


CSPX.AS

1D
-0.10%
1M
5.25%
YTD
11.52%
6M
11.45%
1Y
25.69%
3Y*
18.87%
5Y*
14.77%
10Y*
14.96%

IWDA.AS

1D
-0.03%
1M
4.79%
YTD
11.06%
6M
11.31%
1Y
23.80%
3Y*
17.53%
5Y*
12.88%
10Y*
12.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CSPX.AS vs. IWDA.AS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CSPX.AS
iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF
11.52%4.00%33.87%22.28%-14.24%40.26%7.72%32.99%-0.36%7.13%
IWDA.AS
iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
11.06%7.08%27.23%19.89%-13.54%32.54%6.20%29.58%-4.16%7.49%

Correlation

The correlation between CSPX.AS and IWDA.AS is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 6, 2014

0.97

The correlation between CSPX.AS and IWDA.AS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CSPX.AS vs. IWDA.AS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CSPX.AS
CSPX.AS Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
CSPX.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSPX.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSPX.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
CSPX.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSPX.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

IWDA.AS
IWDA.AS Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
IWDA.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWDA.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWDA.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
IWDA.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWDA.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CSPX.AS vs. IWDA.AS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF (CSPX.AS) and iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IWDA.AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CSPX.ASIWDA.ASDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.41

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.57

3.64

-0.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.76

14.53

-1.77

CSPX.AS vs. IWDA.AS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSPX.AS Sharpe Ratio is 2.25, which is comparable to the IWDA.AS Sharpe Ratio of 2.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSPX.AS and IWDA.AS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CSPX.ASIWDA.ASDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.25

2.15

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

0.90

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

0.84

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.93

0.82

+0.10

Drawdowns

CSPX.AS vs. IWDA.AS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSPX.AS drawdown since its inception was -33.65%, roughly equal to the maximum IWDA.AS drawdown of -33.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSPX.AS and IWDA.AS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CSPX.ASIWDA.ASDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.65%

-33.63%

-0.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.11%

-6.45%

-0.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.37%

-21.59%

-1.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.37%

-21.59%

-1.78%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.65%

-33.63%

-0.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.40%

-0.34%

-0.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.28%

-4.25%

-0.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.00%

1.63%

+0.37%

Volatility

CSPX.AS vs. IWDA.AS - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF (CSPX.AS) and iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IWDA.AS) have volatilities of 2.59% and 2.62%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CSPX.ASIWDA.ASDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.59%

2.62%

-0.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.37%

7.61%

-0.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.26%

10.90%

+0.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.13%

14.08%

+1.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.05%

14.99%

+1.06%

CSPX.AS vs. IWDA.AS - Expense Ratio Comparison

CSPX.AS has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than IWDA.AS's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

CSPX.AS vs. IWDA.AS - Dividend Comparison

Neither CSPX.AS nor IWDA.AS has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, CSPX.AS and IWDA.AS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, CSPX.AS is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CSPX.AS is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for IWDA.AS.

CSPX.AS is categorized as S&P 500, while IWDA.AS is Global Equities. CSPX.AS tracks S&P 500 Index, while IWDA.AS tracks MSCI World Index. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for CSPX.AS and 0.20% for IWDA.AS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CSPX.AS and IWDA.AS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer