CSP1.L vs. WENS.L
CSP1.L (iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF) and WENS.L (iShares MSCI World Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) are both exchange-traded funds - CSP1.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index, while WENS.L is a Energy Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Energy NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, CSP1.L returned 18.26%/yr vs 15.52%/yr for WENS.L. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CSP1.L charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for WENS.L.
Performance
CSP1.L vs. WENS.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
CSP1.L is traded in GBp, while WENS.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the WENS.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CSP1.L achieves a 8.73% return, which is significantly lower than WENS.L's 31.68% return.
CSP1.L
- 1D
- 1.46%
- 1M
- 1.17%
- YTD
- 8.73%
- 6M
- 9.12%
- 1Y
- 26.08%
- 3Y*
- 18.26%
- 5Y*
- 14.38%
- 10Y*
- 15.83%
WENS.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 2.79%
- YTD
- 31.68%
- 6M
- 31.58%
- 1Y
- 43.09%
- 3Y*
- 15.52%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CSP1.L vs. WENS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSP1.L iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF | 8.73% | 9.37% | 27.35% | 19.79% | 1.66% |
WENS.L iShares MSCI World Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 31.68% | 6.73% | 3.85% | -2.00% | 17.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between CSP1.L and WENS.L is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2022 | 0.24 |
The correlation between CSP1.L and WENS.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.08 (1 year) to 0.24 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CSP1.L vs. WENS.L — Risk / Return Rank
CSP1.L
WENS.L
CSP1.L vs. WENS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF (CSP1.L) and iShares MSCI World Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (WENS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CSP1.L | WENS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.72 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.37 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.64 | 2.96 | +0.69 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.18 | 9.41 | +3.77 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CSP1.L vs. WENS.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSP1.L drawdown since its inception was -25.48%, which is greater than WENS.L's maximum drawdown of -21.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSP1.L and WENS.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSP1.L | WENS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.48% | -21.15% | -4.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.12% | -14.63% | +7.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.77% | -21.15% | +0.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.77% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.48% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.88% | -7.41% | +5.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.65% | -8.42% | +4.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.97% | 4.59% | -2.62% |
Volatility
CSP1.L vs. WENS.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF (CSP1.L) is 3.54%, while iShares MSCI World Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (WENS.L) has a volatility of 6.58%. This indicates that CSP1.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WENS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CSP1.L | WENS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.54% | 6.58% | -3.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.53% | 18.29% | -10.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.91% | 21.38% | -10.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.02% | 21.46% | -1.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.45% | 21.46% | -3.01% |
CSP1.L vs. WENS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
CSP1.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than WENS.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
CSP1.L vs. WENS.L - Dividend Comparison
CSP1.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while WENS.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.28%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSP1.L iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WENS.L iShares MSCI World Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 1.28% | 3.25% | 3.52% | 3.61% | 1.77% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CSP1.L and WENS.L have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CSP1.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CSP1.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for WENS.L.
CSP1.L is categorized as S&P 500, while WENS.L is Energy Equities. CSP1.L tracks S&P 500 Index, while WENS.L tracks MSCI World/Energy NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for CSP1.L and 0.25% for WENS.L.
Find the right allocation for CSP1.L and WENS.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer