CSP1.L vs. SPEX.L
CSP1.L (iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF) and SPEX.L (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF Acc) are both S&P 500 funds - CSP1.L tracks the S&P 500 Index while SPEX.L tracks the S&P 500 Equal Weight Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CSP1.L returned 14.94%/yr vs 9.41%/yr for SPEX.L. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CSP1.L charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for SPEX.L.
Performance
CSP1.L vs. SPEX.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CSP1.L achieves a 10.55% return, which is significantly higher than SPEX.L's 9.62% return.
CSP1.L
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 5.54%
- YTD
- 10.55%
- 6M
- 10.48%
- 1Y
- 29.13%
- 3Y*
- 19.02%
- 5Y*
- 14.94%
- 10Y*
- 16.07%
SPEX.L
- 1D
- 0.47%
- 1M
- 4.77%
- YTD
- 9.62%
- 6M
- 10.01%
- 1Y
- 21.02%
- 3Y*
- 12.25%
- 5Y*
- 9.41%
- 10Y*
- —
CSP1.L vs. SPEX.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSP1.L iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF | 10.55% | 9.37% | 27.35% | 19.79% | -9.05% | 19.90% |
SPEX.L Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF Acc | 9.62% | 3.90% | 14.09% | 7.64% | -1.17% | 28.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between CSP1.L and SPEX.L is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 9, 2021 | 0.82 |
The correlation between CSP1.L and SPEX.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (1 year) to 0.82 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
CSP1.L vs. SPEX.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CSP1.L
SPEX.L
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
CSP1.L
SPEX.L
Financial Services
CSP1.L
SPEX.L
Communication Services
CSP1.L
SPEX.L
Consumer Cyclical
CSP1.L
SPEX.L
Healthcare
CSP1.L
SPEX.L
Industrials
CSP1.L
SPEX.L
Consumer Defensive
CSP1.L
SPEX.L
Energy
CSP1.L
SPEX.L
Utilities
CSP1.L
SPEX.L
Real Estate
CSP1.L
SPEX.L
Basic Materials
CSP1.L
SPEX.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CSP1.L vs. SPEX.L — Risk / Return Rank
CSP1.L
SPEX.L
CSP1.L vs. SPEX.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF (CSP1.L) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF Acc (SPEX.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CSP1.L | SPEX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.56 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.65 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | 1.39 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.07 | 3.65 | +0.42 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.99 | 11.85 | +3.14 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CSP1.L | SPEX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.73 | 2.18 | +0.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.04 | 0.67 | +0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.03 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.09 | 0.80 | +0.29 |
Drawdowns
CSP1.L vs. SPEX.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSP1.L drawdown since its inception was -25.48%, which is greater than SPEX.L's maximum drawdown of -19.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSP1.L and SPEX.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSP1.L | SPEX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.48% | -19.65% | -5.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.12% | -5.73% | -1.39% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.77% | -19.65% | -1.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.77% | -19.65% | -1.12% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.48% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.24% | 0.00% | -0.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.32% | -4.12% | +0.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.94% | 1.77% | +0.17% |
Volatility
CSP1.L vs. SPEX.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF (CSP1.L) has a higher volatility of 2.62% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF Acc (SPEX.L) at 1.97%. This indicates that CSP1.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPEX.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CSP1.L | SPEX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.62% | 1.97% | +0.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.16% | 6.62% | +0.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.62% | 9.62% | +1.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.31% | 14.05% | +0.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.57% | 14.60% | +0.97% |
CSP1.L vs. SPEX.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
CSP1.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than SPEX.L's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
CSP1.L vs. SPEX.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither CSP1.L nor SPEX.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CSP1.L and SPEX.L have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CSP1.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CSP1.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for SPEX.L.
CSP1.L tracks S&P 500 Index, while SPEX.L tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for CSP1.L and 0.20% for SPEX.L.
Find the right allocation for CSP1.L and SPEX.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer