PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
CSP1.L vs. PQVM.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

CSP1.L vs. PQVM.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

CSP1.L (iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF) and PQVM.L (Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF) are both S&P 500 funds - CSP1.L tracks the S&P 500 Index while PQVM.L tracks the S&P 500 Quality, Value, and Momentum Multi-Factor Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CSP1.L returned 14.94%/yr vs 16.70%/yr for PQVM.L. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CSP1.L charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for PQVM.L.

Performance

CSP1.L vs. PQVM.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF (CSP1.L) and Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF (PQVM.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

CSP1.L is traded in GBp, while PQVM.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the PQVM.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSP1.L achieves a 10.55% return, which is significantly lower than PQVM.L's 17.12% return.

CSP1.L

1D
0.05%
1M
5.54%
YTD
10.55%
6M
10.48%
1Y
29.13%
3Y*
19.02%
5Y*
14.94%
10Y*
16.07%

PQVM.L

1D
0.39%
1M
5.31%
YTD
17.12%
6M
16.98%
1Y
23.95%
3Y*
21.25%
5Y*
16.70%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CSP1.L vs. PQVM.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CSP1.L
iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF		10.55%9.37%27.35%19.79%-9.05%31.07%13.65%26.42%0.01%9.31%
PQVM.L
Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF		17.12%5.56%32.44%1.48%12.47%27.32%4.88%20.31%-1.48%13.86%

Correlation

The correlation between CSP1.L and PQVM.L is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 24, 2017

0.80

Over the past year, the correlation between CSP1.L and PQVM.L has dropped to 0.57 - well below their long-term average of 0.80, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

CSP1.L vs. PQVM.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
CSP1.L
PQVM.L

Technology

38.0%
25.6%

Financial Services

11.3%
22.0%

Communication Services

10.7%
9.1%

Consumer Cyclical

9.9%
4.2%

Healthcare

8.4%
9.4%

Industrials

7.9%
13.7%

Consumer Defensive

4.7%
5.5%

Energy

3.4%
5.6%

Utilities

2.2%
2.8%

Real Estate

1.9%

-

Basic Materials

1.7%
2.2%

Technology

CSP1.L
38.0%
PQVM.L
25.6%

Financial Services

CSP1.L
11.3%
PQVM.L
22.0%

Communication Services

CSP1.L
10.7%
PQVM.L
9.1%

Consumer Cyclical

CSP1.L
9.9%
PQVM.L
4.2%

Healthcare

CSP1.L
8.4%
PQVM.L
9.4%

Industrials

CSP1.L
7.9%
PQVM.L
13.7%

Consumer Defensive

CSP1.L
4.7%
PQVM.L
5.5%

Energy

CSP1.L
3.4%
PQVM.L
5.6%

Utilities

CSP1.L
2.2%
PQVM.L
2.8%

Real Estate

CSP1.L
1.9%
PQVM.L

-

Basic Materials

CSP1.L
1.7%
PQVM.L
2.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF

Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF

Often compared with CSP1.L:
CSP1.L vs. CSPX.LCSP1.L vs. VUAG.LCSP1.L vs. SPYCSP1.L vs. IUSA.LCSP1.L vs. VUAA.LCSP1.L vs. SPY5.LCSP1.L vs. VOO
Often compared with PQVM.L:
PQVM.L vs. SPMOPQVM.L vs. VOOPQVM.L vs. UETW.DEPQVM.L vs. WEBN.DEPQVM.L vs. SPYL.LPQVM.L vs. SWDA.LPQVM.L vs. QQQ

Return for Risk

CSP1.L vs. PQVM.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
CSP1.L
CSP1.L Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
CSP1.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSP1.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSP1.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
CSP1.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSP1.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
PQVM.L
PQVM.L Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
PQVM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PQVM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
PQVM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
PQVM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
PQVM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CSP1.L vs. PQVM.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF (CSP1.L) and Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF (PQVM.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

CSP1.LPQVM.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.73
2.08

+0.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.66
2.90

+0.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.37

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.07

5.17

-1.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.99

16.89

-1.90

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CSP1.L vs. PQVM.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSP1.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.73, which is higher than the PQVM.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSP1.L and PQVM.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

CSP1.LPQVM.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.73

2.08

+0.65

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.04

1.06

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.03

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.09

0.85

+0.25

Drawdowns

CSP1.L vs. PQVM.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSP1.L drawdown since its inception was -25.48%, roughly equal to the maximum PQVM.L drawdown of -26.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSP1.L and PQVM.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

CSP1.LPQVM.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.48%

-26.48%

+1.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.12%

-4.61%

-2.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.77%

-17.12%

-3.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.77%

-17.12%

-3.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.48%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.24%

0.00%

-0.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.32%

-4.22%

+0.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.94%

1.41%

+0.53%

Volatility

CSP1.L vs. PQVM.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF (CSP1.L) is 2.62%, while Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF (PQVM.L) has a volatility of 3.57%. This indicates that CSP1.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PQVM.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

CSP1.LPQVM.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.62%

3.57%

-0.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.16%

9.05%

-1.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.62%

11.47%

-0.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.31%

15.83%

-1.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.57%

17.14%

-1.57%

CSP1.L vs. PQVM.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

CSP1.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than PQVM.L's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

CSP1.L vs. PQVM.L - Dividend Comparison

CSP1.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PQVM.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.77%.

PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
CSP1.L
iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PQVM.L
Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF		0.77%0.82%0.84%1.58%1.79%0.89%1.48%1.38%1.68%0.71%

Frequently Asked Questions

CSP1.L and PQVM.L have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CSP1.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CSP1.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for PQVM.L.

CSP1.L tracks S&P 500 Index, while PQVM.L tracks S&P 500 Quality, Value, and Momentum Multi-Factor Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for CSP1.L and 0.35% for PQVM.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CSP1.L and PQVM.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer