PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CSP1.L vs. NOV.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CSP1.L vs. NOV.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF (CSP1.L) and Novo Nordisk A/S (NOV.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

CSP1.L is traded in GBp, while NOV.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the NOV.DE values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSP1.L achieves a 10.55% return, which is significantly higher than NOV.DE's -11.27% return. Over the past 10 years, CSP1.L has outperformed NOV.DE with an annualized return of 16.07%, while NOV.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 10.69% annualized return.


CSP1.L

1D
0.05%
1M
5.54%
YTD
10.55%
6M
10.48%
1Y
29.13%
3Y*
19.02%
5Y*
14.94%
10Y*
16.07%

NOV.DE

1D
4.39%
1M
-0.12%
YTD
-11.27%
6M
-4.93%
1Y
-35.94%
3Y*
-17.46%
5Y*
5.25%
10Y*
10.69%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CSP1.L vs. NOV.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CSP1.L
iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF
10.55%9.37%27.35%19.79%-9.05%31.07%13.65%26.42%0.01%10.83%
NOV.DE
Novo Nordisk A/S
-11.27%-43.10%-13.69%46.60%37.72%61.40%19.73%28.35%21.15%40.67%

Correlation

The correlation between CSP1.L and NOV.DE is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2010

0.33

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CSP1.L vs. NOV.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CSP1.L
CSP1.L Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
CSP1.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSP1.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSP1.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
CSP1.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSP1.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

NOV.DE
NOV.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
NOV.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NOV.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
NOV.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
NOV.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
NOV.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CSP1.L vs. NOV.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF (CSP1.L) and Novo Nordisk A/S (NOV.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CSP1.LNOV.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

0.90

+0.61

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.07

-0.67

+4.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.99

-1.01

+16.00

CSP1.L vs. NOV.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSP1.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.73, which is higher than the NOV.DE Sharpe Ratio of -0.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSP1.L and NOV.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CSP1.LNOV.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.73

-0.67

+3.40

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.04

0.14

+0.91

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.03

0.32

+0.71

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.09

0.55

+0.54

Drawdowns

CSP1.L vs. NOV.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSP1.L drawdown since its inception was -25.48%, smaller than the maximum NOV.DE drawdown of -75.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSP1.L and NOV.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CSP1.LNOV.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.48%

-75.95%

+50.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.12%

-53.54%

+46.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.77%

-75.95%

+55.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.77%

-75.95%

+55.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.48%

-75.95%

+50.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.24%

-69.83%

+69.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.32%

-11.40%

+8.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.94%

35.69%

-33.75%

Volatility

CSP1.L vs. NOV.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF (CSP1.L) is 2.62%, while Novo Nordisk A/S (NOV.DE) has a volatility of 8.69%. This indicates that CSP1.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NOV.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CSP1.LNOV.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.62%

8.69%

-6.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.16%

39.33%

-32.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.62%

53.41%

-42.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.31%

37.96%

-23.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.57%

33.68%

-18.11%

Dividends

CSP1.L vs. NOV.DE - Dividend Comparison

CSP1.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NOV.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.11%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CSP1.L
iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NOV.DE
Novo Nordisk A/S
4.11%3.54%1.58%1.01%1.17%1.27%1.98%2.08%27.19%2.27%3.67%1.25%

Frequently Asked Questions


CSP1.L and NOV.DE have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CSP1.L and NOV.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer