CSP1.L vs. ISPA.DE
CSP1.L (iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF) and ISPA.DE (iShares STOXX Global Select Dividend 100 UCITS ETF (DE)) are both exchange-traded funds - CSP1.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index, while ISPA.DE is a Global Equities fund tracking the STOXX® Global Select Dividend 100 index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CSP1.L returned 16.07%/yr vs 9.97%/yr for ISPA.DE. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CSP1.L charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.46%/yr for ISPA.DE.
Performance
CSP1.L vs. ISPA.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
CSP1.L is traded in GBp, while ISPA.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the ISPA.DE values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CSP1.L achieves a 10.55% return, which is significantly lower than ISPA.DE's 11.87% return. Over the past 10 years, CSP1.L has outperformed ISPA.DE with an annualized return of 16.07%, while ISPA.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 9.97% annualized return.
CSP1.L
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 5.54%
- YTD
- 10.55%
- 6M
- 10.48%
- 1Y
- 29.13%
- 3Y*
- 19.02%
- 5Y*
- 14.94%
- 10Y*
- 16.07%
ISPA.DE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 2.09%
- YTD
- 11.87%
- 6M
- 13.62%
- 1Y
- 32.18%
- 3Y*
- 18.57%
- 5Y*
- 11.01%
- 10Y*
- 9.97%
CSP1.L vs. ISPA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSP1.L iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF | 10.55% | 9.37% | 27.35% | 19.79% | -9.05% | 31.07% | 13.65% | 26.42% | 0.01% | 10.83% |
ISPA.DE iShares STOXX Global Select Dividend 100 UCITS ETF (DE) | 12.59% | 25.95% | 8.04% | 2.71% | 5.94% | 13.76% | -3.99% | 17.77% | -6.20% | 7.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between CSP1.L and ISPA.DE is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2010 | 0.59 |
The correlation between CSP1.L and ISPA.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.46 (3 years) to 0.64 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CSP1.L vs. ISPA.DE — Risk / Return Rank
CSP1.L
ISPA.DE
CSP1.L vs. ISPA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF (CSP1.L) and iShares STOXX Global Select Dividend 100 UCITS ETF (DE) (ISPA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CSP1.L | ISPA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | 1.69 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.07 | 7.14 | -3.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.99 | 26.83 | -11.84 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CSP1.L | ISPA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.73 | 3.75 | -1.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.04 | 0.93 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.03 | 0.68 | +0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.09 | 0.65 | +0.44 |
Drawdowns
CSP1.L vs. ISPA.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSP1.L drawdown since its inception was -25.48%, smaller than the maximum ISPA.DE drawdown of -32.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSP1.L and ISPA.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSP1.L | ISPA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.48% | -32.66% | +7.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.12% | -4.49% | -2.63% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.77% | -12.89% | -7.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.77% | -15.30% | -5.47% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.48% | -32.66% | +7.18% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.24% | -1.37% | +1.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.32% | -4.26% | +0.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.94% | 1.20% | +0.74% |
Volatility
CSP1.L vs. ISPA.DE - Volatility Comparison
iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF (CSP1.L) and iShares STOXX Global Select Dividend 100 UCITS ETF (DE) (ISPA.DE) have volatilities of 2.62% and 2.52%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CSP1.L | ISPA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.62% | 2.52% | +0.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.16% | 6.52% | +0.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.62% | 8.53% | +2.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.31% | 11.76% | +2.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.57% | 14.50% | +1.07% |
CSP1.L vs. ISPA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
CSP1.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than ISPA.DE's 0.46% expense ratio.
Dividends
CSP1.L vs. ISPA.DE - Dividend Comparison
CSP1.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ISPA.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.75%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSP1.L iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ISPA.DE iShares STOXX Global Select Dividend 100 UCITS ETF (DE) | 3.75% | 4.52% | 4.89% | 5.91% | 6.92% | 3.32% | 4.04% | 4.02% | 3.37% | 5.66% | 3.64% | 4.35% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CSP1.L and ISPA.DE have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CSP1.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CSP1.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for ISPA.DE.
CSP1.L is categorized as S&P 500, while ISPA.DE is Global Equities. CSP1.L tracks S&P 500 Index, while ISPA.DE tracks STOXX® Global Select Dividend 100 index. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for CSP1.L and 0.46% for ISPA.DE.
Find the right allocation for CSP1.L and ISPA.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer