CSP1.L vs. IITU.L
CSP1.L (iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF) and IITU.L (iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - CSP1.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index, while IITU.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Information Technology Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CSP1.L returned 16.07%/yr vs 27.26%/yr for IITU.L. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CSP1.L charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for IITU.L.
Performance
CSP1.L vs. IITU.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CSP1.L achieves a 10.55% return, which is significantly lower than IITU.L's 23.25% return. Over the past 10 years, CSP1.L has underperformed IITU.L with an annualized return of 16.07%, while IITU.L has yielded a comparatively higher 27.26% annualized return.
CSP1.L
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 5.54%
- YTD
- 10.55%
- 6M
- 10.48%
- 1Y
- 29.13%
- 3Y*
- 19.02%
- 5Y*
- 14.94%
- 10Y*
- 16.07%
IITU.L
- 1D
- -2.08%
- 1M
- 14.24%
- YTD
- 23.25%
- 6M
- 22.00%
- 1Y
- 53.38%
- 3Y*
- 30.94%
- 5Y*
- 25.50%
- 10Y*
- 27.26%
CSP1.L vs. IITU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSP1.L iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF | 10.55% | 9.37% | 27.35% | 19.79% | -9.05% | 31.07% | 13.65% | 26.42% | 0.01% | 10.83% |
IITU.L iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 23.25% | 14.44% | 40.85% | 50.70% | -20.63% | 35.67% | 38.34% | 44.21% | 4.28% | 25.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between CSP1.L and IITU.L is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 24, 2015 | 0.87 |
The correlation between CSP1.L and IITU.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.
CSP1.L vs. IITU.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CSP1.L
IITU.L
Technology
Financial Services
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Technology
CSP1.L
IITU.L
Financial Services
CSP1.L
IITU.L
-
Communication Services
CSP1.L
IITU.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
CSP1.L
IITU.L
-
Healthcare
CSP1.L
IITU.L
-
Industrials
CSP1.L
IITU.L
Consumer Defensive
CSP1.L
IITU.L
-
Energy
CSP1.L
IITU.L
Utilities
CSP1.L
IITU.L
-
Real Estate
CSP1.L
IITU.L
-
Basic Materials
CSP1.L
IITU.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CSP1.L vs. IITU.L — Risk / Return Rank
CSP1.L
IITU.L
CSP1.L vs. IITU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF (CSP1.L) and iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IITU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CSP1.L | IITU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | 1.44 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.07 | 3.17 | +0.90 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.99 | 8.17 | +6.82 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CSP1.L | IITU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.73 | 2.71 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.04 | 1.16 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.03 | 1.28 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.09 | 1.23 | -0.13 |
Drawdowns
CSP1.L vs. IITU.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSP1.L drawdown since its inception was -25.48%, smaller than the maximum IITU.L drawdown of -28.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSP1.L and IITU.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSP1.L | IITU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.48% | -28.03% | +2.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.12% | -16.76% | +9.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.77% | -28.03% | +7.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.77% | -28.03% | +7.26% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.48% | -28.03% | +2.55% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.24% | -2.89% | +2.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.32% | -5.14% | +1.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.94% | 6.51% | -4.57% |
Volatility
CSP1.L vs. IITU.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF (CSP1.L) is 2.62%, while iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IITU.L) has a volatility of 7.01%. This indicates that CSP1.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IITU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CSP1.L | IITU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.62% | 7.01% | -4.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.16% | 14.45% | -7.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.62% | 19.60% | -8.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.31% | 21.94% | -7.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.57% | 21.31% | -5.74% |
CSP1.L vs. IITU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
CSP1.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than IITU.L's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
CSP1.L vs. IITU.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither CSP1.L nor IITU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CSP1.L and IITU.L have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CSP1.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CSP1.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for IITU.L.
CSP1.L is categorized as S&P 500, while IITU.L is Technology Equities. CSP1.L tracks S&P 500 Index, while IITU.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Information Technology Index. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for CSP1.L and 0.15% for IITU.L.
Find the right allocation for CSP1.L and IITU.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer