CSP1.L vs. ICOM.L
CSP1.L (iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF) and ICOM.L (iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CSP1.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index, while ICOM.L is a Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity (Total Return Index). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CSP1.L returned 14.94%/yr vs 12.26%/yr for ICOM.L. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CSP1.L charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for ICOM.L.
Performance
CSP1.L vs. ICOM.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
CSP1.L is traded in GBp, while ICOM.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ICOM.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CSP1.L achieves a 10.55% return, which is significantly lower than ICOM.L's 25.24% return.
CSP1.L
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 5.54%
- YTD
- 10.55%
- 6M
- 10.48%
- 1Y
- 29.13%
- 3Y*
- 19.02%
- 5Y*
- 14.94%
- 10Y*
- 16.07%
ICOM.L
- 1D
- -1.26%
- 1M
- -2.76%
- YTD
- 25.24%
- 6M
- 23.33%
- 1Y
- 38.99%
- 3Y*
- 12.76%
- 5Y*
- 12.26%
- 10Y*
- —
CSP1.L vs. ICOM.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSP1.L iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF | 10.55% | 9.37% | 27.35% | 19.79% | -9.05% | 31.07% | 13.65% | 26.42% | 0.01% | 5.83% |
ICOM.L iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF | 25.24% | 8.16% | 6.90% | -12.66% | 28.48% | 28.25% | -6.57% | 2.69% | -4.87% | 2.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between CSP1.L and ICOM.L is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 27, 2017 | 0.25 |
The correlation between CSP1.L and ICOM.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (1 year) to 0.25 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
CSP1.L vs. ICOM.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CSP1.L
ICOM.L
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Consumer Defensive
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
CSP1.L
ICOM.L
Financial Services
CSP1.L
ICOM.L
Communication Services
CSP1.L
ICOM.L
Consumer Cyclical
CSP1.L
ICOM.L
Healthcare
CSP1.L
ICOM.L
-
Industrials
CSP1.L
ICOM.L
-
Consumer Defensive
CSP1.L
ICOM.L
Energy
CSP1.L
ICOM.L
-
Utilities
CSP1.L
ICOM.L
-
Real Estate
CSP1.L
ICOM.L
Basic Materials
CSP1.L
ICOM.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CSP1.L vs. ICOM.L — Risk / Return Rank
CSP1.L
ICOM.L
CSP1.L vs. ICOM.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF (CSP1.L) and iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (ICOM.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CSP1.L | ICOM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.61 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | 1.39 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.07 | 5.21 | -1.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.99 | 12.08 | +2.92 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CSP1.L | ICOM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.73 | 2.12 | +0.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.04 | 0.73 | +0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.03 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.09 | 0.52 | +0.57 |
Drawdowns
CSP1.L vs. ICOM.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSP1.L drawdown since its inception was -25.48%, smaller than the maximum ICOM.L drawdown of -28.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSP1.L and ICOM.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSP1.L | ICOM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.48% | -28.82% | +3.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.12% | -7.45% | +0.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.77% | -14.48% | -6.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.77% | -28.82% | +8.05% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.48% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.24% | -4.74% | +4.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.32% | -12.30% | +8.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.94% | 3.22% | -1.28% |
Volatility
CSP1.L vs. ICOM.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF (CSP1.L) is 2.62%, while iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (ICOM.L) has a volatility of 5.49%. This indicates that CSP1.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ICOM.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CSP1.L | ICOM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.62% | 5.49% | -2.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.16% | 15.96% | -8.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.62% | 18.28% | -7.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.31% | 16.73% | -2.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.57% | 15.71% | -0.14% |
CSP1.L vs. ICOM.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
CSP1.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than ICOM.L's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
CSP1.L vs. ICOM.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither CSP1.L nor ICOM.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CSP1.L and ICOM.L have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CSP1.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CSP1.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for ICOM.L.
CSP1.L is categorized as S&P 500, while ICOM.L is Commodities. CSP1.L tracks S&P 500 Index, while ICOM.L tracks Bloomberg Commodity (Total Return Index). Their fees differ too: 0.07% for CSP1.L and 0.19% for ICOM.L.
Find the right allocation for CSP1.L and ICOM.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer