PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CSP1.L vs. ICOM.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CSP1.L vs. ICOM.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF (CSP1.L) and iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (ICOM.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

CSP1.L is traded in GBp, while ICOM.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ICOM.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSP1.L achieves a 10.55% return, which is significantly lower than ICOM.L's 25.24% return.


CSP1.L

1D
0.05%
1M
5.54%
YTD
10.55%
6M
10.48%
1Y
29.13%
3Y*
19.02%
5Y*
14.94%
10Y*
16.07%

ICOM.L

1D
-1.26%
1M
-2.76%
YTD
25.24%
6M
23.33%
1Y
38.99%
3Y*
12.76%
5Y*
12.26%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CSP1.L vs. ICOM.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CSP1.L
iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF
10.55%9.37%27.35%19.79%-9.05%31.07%13.65%26.42%0.01%5.83%
ICOM.L
iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF
25.24%8.16%6.90%-12.66%28.48%28.25%-6.57%2.69%-4.87%2.50%

Correlation

The correlation between CSP1.L and ICOM.L is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 27, 2017

0.25

The correlation between CSP1.L and ICOM.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (1 year) to 0.25 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

CSP1.L vs. ICOM.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CSP1.L
ICOM.L

Technology

38.0%
5.6%

Financial Services

11.3%
17.8%

Communication Services

10.7%
12.3%

Consumer Cyclical

9.9%
12.9%

Healthcare

8.4%

-

Industrials

7.9%

-

Consumer Defensive

4.7%
9.7%

Energy

3.4%

-

Utilities

2.2%

-

Real Estate

1.9%
5.8%

Basic Materials

1.7%
35.8%

Technology

CSP1.L
38.0%
ICOM.L
5.6%

Financial Services

CSP1.L
11.3%
ICOM.L
17.8%

Communication Services

CSP1.L
10.7%
ICOM.L
12.3%

Consumer Cyclical

CSP1.L
9.9%
ICOM.L
12.9%

Healthcare

CSP1.L
8.4%
ICOM.L

-

Industrials

CSP1.L
7.9%
ICOM.L

-

Consumer Defensive

CSP1.L
4.7%
ICOM.L
9.7%

Energy

CSP1.L
3.4%
ICOM.L

-

Utilities

CSP1.L
2.2%
ICOM.L

-

Real Estate

CSP1.L
1.9%
ICOM.L
5.8%

Basic Materials

CSP1.L
1.7%
ICOM.L
35.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CSP1.L vs. ICOM.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CSP1.L
CSP1.L Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
CSP1.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSP1.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSP1.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
CSP1.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSP1.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

ICOM.L
ICOM.L Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
ICOM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ICOM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
ICOM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
ICOM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
ICOM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CSP1.L vs. ICOM.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF (CSP1.L) and iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (ICOM.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CSP1.LICOM.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.39

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.07

5.21

-1.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.99

12.08

+2.92

CSP1.L vs. ICOM.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSP1.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.73, which is comparable to the ICOM.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSP1.L and ICOM.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CSP1.LICOM.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.73

2.12

+0.61

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.04

0.73

+0.31

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.09

0.52

+0.57

Drawdowns

CSP1.L vs. ICOM.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSP1.L drawdown since its inception was -25.48%, smaller than the maximum ICOM.L drawdown of -28.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSP1.L and ICOM.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CSP1.LICOM.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.48%

-28.82%

+3.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.12%

-7.45%

+0.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.77%

-14.48%

-6.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.77%

-28.82%

+8.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.24%

-4.74%

+4.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.32%

-12.30%

+8.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.94%

3.22%

-1.28%

Volatility

CSP1.L vs. ICOM.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF (CSP1.L) is 2.62%, while iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (ICOM.L) has a volatility of 5.49%. This indicates that CSP1.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ICOM.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CSP1.LICOM.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.62%

5.49%

-2.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.16%

15.96%

-8.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.62%

18.28%

-7.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.31%

16.73%

-2.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.57%

15.71%

-0.14%

CSP1.L vs. ICOM.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

CSP1.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than ICOM.L's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

CSP1.L vs. ICOM.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither CSP1.L nor ICOM.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


CSP1.L and ICOM.L have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CSP1.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CSP1.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for ICOM.L.

CSP1.L is categorized as S&P 500, while ICOM.L is Commodities. CSP1.L tracks S&P 500 Index, while ICOM.L tracks Bloomberg Commodity (Total Return Index). Their fees differ too: 0.07% for CSP1.L and 0.19% for ICOM.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CSP1.L and ICOM.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer