PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CSOIX vs. FQTIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CSOIX vs. FQTIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Credit Suisse Strategic Income Fund (CSOIX) and Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series I (FQTIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSOIX achieves a -0.14% return, which is significantly lower than FQTIX's 3.02% return.


CSOIX

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.44%
6M
0.04%
YTD
-0.14%
1Y
1.83%
3Y*
6.09%
5Y*
3.88%
10Y*
5.30%
ALL TIME*
5.39%

FQTIX

1D
-0.12%
1M
-0.91%
6M
1.56%
YTD
3.02%
1Y
7.36%
3Y*
7.95%
5Y*
3.50%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
4.40%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

CSOIX vs. FQTIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
CSOIX
Credit Suisse Strategic Income Fund
-0.14%5.66%8.26%12.62%-7.23%5.47%4.77%4.64%
FQTIX
Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series I
3.02%7.51%8.03%13.44%-14.39%8.51%3.68%4.11%

Correlation

The correlation between CSOIX and FQTIX is 0.62, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.58

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2019

0.62

The correlation between CSOIX and FQTIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CSOIX vs. FQTIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CSOIX
CSOIX Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
CSOIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSOIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSOIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
CSOIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSOIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

FQTIX
FQTIX Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
FQTIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FQTIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
FQTIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
FQTIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
FQTIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CSOIX vs. FQTIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Credit Suisse Strategic Income Fund (CSOIX) and Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series I (FQTIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CSOIXFQTIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.75

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.51

-0.37

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.57

3.31

-2.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.07

15.98

-13.91

CSOIX vs. FQTIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSOIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.61, which is lower than the FQTIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSOIX and FQTIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CSOIX vs. FQTIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSOIX drawdown since its inception was -20.04%, smaller than the maximum FQTIX drawdown of -24.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSOIX and FQTIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CSOIXFQTIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.04%

-24.62%

+4.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.86%

-2.20%

-0.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.92%

-5.59%

+2.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.39%

-18.81%

+8.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.55%

-1.03%

+0.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.47%

-4.23%

+2.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.79%

0.45%

+0.34%

Volatility

CSOIX vs. FQTIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Credit Suisse Strategic Income Fund (CSOIX) is 0.34%, while Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series I (FQTIX) has a volatility of 0.61%. This indicates that CSOIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FQTIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CSOIXFQTIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.34%

0.61%

-0.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.09%

2.41%

-0.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.72%

3.09%

-0.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.35%

5.93%

-2.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.98%

7.64%

-3.66%

CSOIX vs. FQTIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CSOIX has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than FQTIX's 0.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

CSOIX vs. FQTIX - Dividend Comparison

CSOIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.92%, less than FQTIX's 7.06% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CSOIX
Credit Suisse Strategic Income Fund
5.92%7.12%7.05%6.72%4.39%3.92%4.95%5.35%5.45%5.18%7.19%6.86%
FQTIX
Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series I
7.06%5.70%7.86%7.64%8.10%7.15%6.89%5.63%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CSOIX and FQTIX have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FQTIX has higher volatility (0.61%) compared to CSOIX (0.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CSOIX dropped -20.04% vs FQTIX's -24.62%.

FQTIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CSOIX and FQTIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer