CSNR vs. RAVI
CSNR (Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF) and RAVI (FlexShares Ultra-Short Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CSNR is a Commodity Producers Equities fund actively managed by Cohen & Steers, while RAVI is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by FlexShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, CSNR returned 47.34% vs 4.50% for RAVI. At a correlation of -0.04, they often move in opposite directions. CSNR charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for RAVI.
Performance
CSNR vs. RAVI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CSNR achieves a 21.88% return, which is significantly higher than RAVI's 1.53% return.
CSNR
- 1D
- -0.56%
- 1M
- 1.40%
- YTD
- 21.88%
- 6M
- 24.62%
- 1Y
- 47.34%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RAVI
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.39%
- YTD
- 1.53%
- 6M
- 1.92%
- 1Y
- 4.50%
- 3Y*
- 5.21%
- 5Y*
- 3.50%
- 10Y*
- 2.67%
CSNR vs. RAVI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CSNR Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF | 21.88% | 26.55% |
RAVI FlexShares Ultra-Short Income ETF | 1.53% | 4.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between CSNR and RAVI is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 6, 2025 | -0.04 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CSNR vs. RAVI — Risk / Return Rank
CSNR
RAVI
CSNR vs. RAVI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF (CSNR) and FlexShares Ultra-Short Income ETF (RAVI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CSNR | RAVI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -8.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -20.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 5.39 | -3.91 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.67 | 38.66 | -32.99 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 22.27 | 225.58 | -203.31 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CSNR | RAVI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.81 | 11.02 | -8.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 2.49 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 2.09 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.97 | 2.03 | -0.06 |
Drawdowns
CSNR vs. RAVI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSNR drawdown since its inception was -15.33%, which is greater than RAVI's maximum drawdown of -3.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSNR and RAVI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSNR | RAVI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.33% | -3.72% | -11.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.39% | -0.12% | -8.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -0.36% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -3.28% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -3.72% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.42% | 0.00% | -1.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.82% | -0.17% | -1.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.13% | 0.02% | +2.11% |
Volatility
CSNR vs. RAVI - Volatility Comparison
Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF (CSNR) has a higher volatility of 4.24% compared to FlexShares Ultra-Short Income ETF (RAVI) at 0.15%. This indicates that CSNR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RAVI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CSNR | RAVI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.24% | 0.15% | +4.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.65% | 0.30% | +13.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.94% | 0.41% | +16.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.77% | 1.41% | +18.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.77% | 1.28% | +18.49% |
CSNR vs. RAVI - Expense Ratio Comparison
CSNR has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than RAVI's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
CSNR vs. RAVI - Dividend Comparison
CSNR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.98%, less than RAVI's 4.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSNR Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF | 1.98% | 2.39% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RAVI FlexShares Ultra-Short Income ETF | 4.38% | 4.59% | 5.34% | 4.55% | 1.70% | 0.90% | 1.29% | 2.53% | 2.22% | 1.28% | 0.90% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CSNR and RAVI have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CSNR has higher volatility (4.24%) compared to RAVI (0.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CSNR dropped -15.33% vs RAVI's -3.72%.
On 1-year performance, CSNR leads with 47.34% vs 4.50% for RAVI. On fees, RAVI is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, RAVI has been the lower-risk option at 0.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, CSNR has performed better with a 47.34% return vs 4.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RAVI is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for CSNR.
RAVI has the higher dividend yield at 4.38%, compared with 1.98% for CSNR.
CSNR is categorized as Commodity Producers Equities, while RAVI is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: Cohen & Steers and FlexShares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for CSNR and 0.25% for RAVI.
RAVI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (11.02 vs 2.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CSNR and RAVI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer