CSNR vs. FTSD
CSNR (Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF) and FTSD (Franklin Short Duration U.S. Government ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CSNR is a Commodity Producers Equities fund actively managed by Cohen & Steers, while FTSD is a Mortgage Backed Securities fund actively managed by Franklin Templeton. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, CSNR returned 47.34% vs 4.31% for FTSD. At a correlation of -0.15, they often move in opposite directions. CSNR charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for FTSD.
Performance
CSNR vs. FTSD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CSNR achieves a 21.88% return, which is significantly higher than FTSD's 0.80% return.
CSNR
- 1D
- -0.56%
- 1M
- 1.40%
- YTD
- 21.88%
- 6M
- 24.62%
- 1Y
- 47.34%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FTSD
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 0.17%
- YTD
- 0.80%
- 6M
- 1.30%
- 1Y
- 4.31%
- 3Y*
- 4.98%
- 5Y*
- 2.46%
- 10Y*
- 2.05%
CSNR vs. FTSD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CSNR Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF | 21.88% | 26.55% |
FTSD Franklin Short Duration U.S. Government ETF | 0.80% | 5.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between CSNR and FTSD is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 6, 2025 | -0.15 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CSNR vs. FTSD — Risk / Return Rank
CSNR
FTSD
CSNR vs. FTSD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF (CSNR) and Franklin Short Duration U.S. Government ETF (FTSD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CSNR | FTSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.68 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.69 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.67 | 9.59 | -3.92 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 22.27 | 38.36 | -16.09 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CSNR | FTSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.81 | 3.30 | -0.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.33 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.15 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.97 | 1.04 | +0.93 |
Drawdowns
CSNR vs. FTSD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSNR drawdown since its inception was -15.33%, which is greater than FTSD's maximum drawdown of -5.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSNR and FTSD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSNR | FTSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.33% | -5.32% | -10.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.39% | -0.45% | -7.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -0.93% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -5.04% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -5.32% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.42% | -0.12% | -1.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.82% | -0.60% | -1.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.13% | 0.11% | +2.02% |
Volatility
CSNR vs. FTSD - Volatility Comparison
Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF (CSNR) has a higher volatility of 4.24% compared to Franklin Short Duration U.S. Government ETF (FTSD) at 0.51%. This indicates that CSNR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTSD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CSNR | FTSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.24% | 0.51% | +3.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.65% | 1.03% | +12.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.94% | 1.31% | +15.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.77% | 1.85% | +17.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.77% | 1.79% | +17.98% |
CSNR vs. FTSD - Expense Ratio Comparison
CSNR has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than FTSD's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
CSNR vs. FTSD - Dividend Comparison
CSNR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.98%, less than FTSD's 4.50% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSNR Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF | 1.98% | 2.39% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FTSD Franklin Short Duration U.S. Government ETF | 4.50% | 4.67% | 4.75% | 4.14% | 1.73% | 1.01% | 1.54% | 2.90% | 2.63% | 2.24% | 1.92% | 1.52% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CSNR and FTSD have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CSNR has higher volatility (4.24%) compared to FTSD (0.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CSNR dropped -15.33% vs FTSD's -5.32%.
On 1-year performance, CSNR leads with 47.34% vs 4.31% for FTSD. On fees, FTSD is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, FTSD has been the lower-risk option at 0.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, CSNR has performed better with a 47.34% return vs 4.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FTSD is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for CSNR.
FTSD has the higher dividend yield at 4.50%, compared with 1.98% for CSNR.
CSNR is categorized as Commodity Producers Equities, while FTSD is Mortgage Backed Securities. They also come from different issuers: Cohen & Steers and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for CSNR and 0.25% for FTSD.
FTSD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.30 vs 2.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CSNR and FTSD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer