CSNR vs. CSEN

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

CSNR (Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF) and CSEN (Cohen & Steers Future of Energy Active ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CSNR is a Natural Resources fund actively managed by Cohen & Steers, while CSEN is a Energy Equities fund actively managed by Cohen & Steers. Both are actively managed. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CSNR charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for CSEN.

Performance

CSNR vs. CSEN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF (CSNR) and Cohen & Steers Future of Energy Active ETF (CSEN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

CSNR

• 1D: -1.07%
• 1M: -4.95%
• 6M: 2.89%
• YTD: 11.48%
• 1Y: 30.62%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CSEN

• 1D: -0.70%
• 1M: -1.06%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CSNR vs. CSEN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
CSNR Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF	-5.79%
CSEN Cohen & Steers Future of Energy Active ETF	-2.11%

Correlation

The correlation between CSNR and CSEN is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 15, 2026	0.57

Return for Risk

CSNR vs. CSEN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CSNR

CSNR Risk / Return Rank: 62
CSNR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
CSNR Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
CSNR Omega Ratio Rank: 63
CSNR Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
CSNR Martin Ratio Rank: 60

CSEN

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CSNR vs. CSEN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF (CSNR) and Cohen & Steers Future of Energy Active ETF (CSEN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CSNR	CSEN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.73	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.29	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.47	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.28	—	—

Drawdowns

CSNR vs. CSEN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSNR drawdown since its inception was -15.33%, which is greater than CSEN's maximum drawdown of -5.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSNR and CSEN.

Drawdown Indicators

	CSNR	CSEN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.33%	-5.10%	-10.23%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.43%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.83%	-2.35%	-7.48%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.36%	-2.69%	+0.33%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.71%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CSNR	CSEN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.46%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.33%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.77%	15.07%	+2.70%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.76%	15.07%	+4.69%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.76%	15.07%	+4.69%

CSNR vs. CSEN - Expense Ratio Comparison

CSNR has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than CSEN's 0.80% expense ratio.

Dividends

CSNR vs. CSEN - Dividend Comparison

CSNR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.97%, more than CSEN's 0.33% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
CSEN Cohen & Steers Future of Energy Active ETF	0.33%	0.00%
CSNR Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF	1.97%	2.39%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CSNR and CSEN in my portfolio?

CSNR and CSEN have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CSNR or CSEN?

On fees, CSNR is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CSNR or CSEN?

CSNR is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for CSEN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CSNR or CSEN?

CSNR has the higher dividend yield at 1.97%, compared with 0.33% for CSEN.

What is the main difference between CSNR and CSEN?

CSNR is categorized as Natural Resources, while CSEN is Energy Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for CSNR and 0.80% for CSEN.