CSMD vs. AMID

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

CSMD (Congress SMID Growth ETF) and AMID (Argent Mid Cap ETF) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, CSMD returned 6.14% vs 7.07% for AMID. Their correlation of 0.89 means they have usually moved in the same direction. CSMD charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.52%/yr for AMID.

Performance

CSMD vs. AMID - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Congress SMID Growth ETF (CSMD) and Argent Mid Cap ETF (AMID). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with CSMD having a 6.61% return and AMID slightly higher at 6.88%.

CSMD

• 1D: 0.54%
• 1M: -5.76%
• 6M: 0.90%
• YTD: 6.61%
• 1Y: 6.14%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 10.82%

AMID

• 1D: 0.94%
• 1M: -0.06%
• 6M: 4.61%
• YTD: 6.88%
• 1Y: 7.07%
• 3Y*: 9.74%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 9.94%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
AMID Argent Mid Cap ETF	$353.84K	$312.78K	$391.35K
CSMD Congress SMID Growth ETF	$1.22M	$1.16M	$1.45M

CSMD vs. AMID - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
CSMD Congress SMID Growth ETF	6.61%	5.68%	12.70%	6.54%
AMID Argent Mid Cap ETF	6.88%	-1.39%	13.06%	14.59%

Correlation

The correlation between CSMD and AMID is 0.89, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 22, 2023	0.89

The correlation between CSMD and AMID has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

CSMD vs. AMID - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	CSMD	AMID
Industrials	23.6%	33.1%
Technology	22.1%	23.4%
Healthcare	20.7%	8.0%
Consumer Cyclical	7.4%	7.0%
Consumer Defensive	7.1%	2.7%
Financial Services	6.9%	16.0%
Basic Materials	5.9%	3.7%
Energy	3.6%	3.5%
Real Estate	1.7%	3.3%
Communication Services	-	-
Utilities	-	2.7%

Return for Risk

CSMD vs. AMID — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CSMD

CSMD Risk / Return Rank: 17
CSMD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
CSMD Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
CSMD Omega Ratio Rank: 16
CSMD Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
CSMD Martin Ratio Rank: 18

AMID

AMID Risk / Return Rank: 20
AMID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
AMID Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
AMID Omega Ratio Rank: 18
AMID Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
AMID Martin Ratio Rank: 23

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CSMD vs. AMID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Congress SMID Growth ETF (CSMD) and Argent Mid Cap ETF (AMID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CSMD	AMID	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.25	0.36	-0.11
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.51	0.64	-0.14
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.06	1.07	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.35	0.49	-0.14
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.01	1.69	-0.68

CSMD vs. AMID - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSMD Sharpe Ratio is 0.25, which is lower than the AMID Sharpe Ratio of 0.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSMD and AMID, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CSMD vs. AMID - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSMD drawdown since its inception was -22.54%, roughly equal to the maximum AMID drawdown of -23.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSMD and AMID.

Drawdown Indicators

	CSMD	AMID	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.54%	-23.32%	+0.78%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.79%	-12.31%	-2.48%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-23.32%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.62%	-4.03%	-3.59%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.68%	-6.12%	+1.44%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.15%	3.55%	+1.60%

Volatility

CSMD vs. AMID - Volatility Comparison

Congress SMID Growth ETF (CSMD) has a higher volatility of 5.19% compared to Argent Mid Cap ETF (AMID) at 4.44%. This indicates that CSMD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AMID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CSMD	AMID	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.19%	4.44%	+0.75%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.05%	12.77%	+3.28%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.58%	16.71%	+3.87%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.97%	19.03%	+0.94%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.97%	19.03%	+0.94%

CSMD vs. AMID - Expense Ratio Comparison

CSMD has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than AMID's 0.52% expense ratio.

Dividends

CSMD vs. AMID - Dividend Comparison

CSMD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AMID's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
AMID Argent Mid Cap ETF	0.33%	0.36%	0.33%	0.43%	0.25%
CSMD Congress SMID Growth ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.40%	0.02%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CSMD and AMID in my portfolio?

CSMD and AMID have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CSMD or AMID?

CSMD has higher volatility (5.19%) compared to AMID (4.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CSMD dropped -22.54% vs AMID's -23.32%.

Which ETF is better, CSMD or AMID?

On 1-year performance, AMID leads with 7.07% vs 6.14% for CSMD. On fees, AMID is cheaper at 0.52% per year. On volatility, AMID has been the lower-risk option at 4.44%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CSMD or AMID?

Over the 1-year period, AMID has performed better with a 7.07% return vs 6.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CSMD or AMID?

AMID is cheaper with a 0.52% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for CSMD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CSMD or AMID?

AMID has the higher dividend yield at 0.33%, compared with 0.00% for CSMD.

What is the main difference between CSMD and AMID?

They also come from different issuers: Congress and Argent. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for CSMD and 0.52% for AMID.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AMID currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.36 vs 0.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.