CSIBX vs. LMSMX
CSIBX (Calvert Bond Fund) and LMSMX (Western Asset SMASh Series M Fund) are both Intermediate Core-Plus Bond funds. Over the past 5 years, CSIBX returned 0.16%/yr vs -2.43%/yr for LMSMX. Their correlation of 0.85 means they have usually moved in the same direction. CSIBX charges 0.73%/yr vs 0.00%/yr for LMSMX.
Performance
CSIBX vs. LMSMX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CSIBX achieves a -0.87% return, which is significantly lower than LMSMX's 0.82% return.
CSIBX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -1.24%
- 6M
- -1.22%
- YTD
- -0.87%
- 1Y
- 1.83%
- 3Y*
- 4.23%
- 5Y*
- 0.16%
- 10Y*
- 1.90%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.26%
LMSMX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.51%
- 6M
- 0.18%
- YTD
- 0.82%
- 1Y
- 4.29%
- 3Y*
- 5.35%
- 5Y*
- -2.43%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 1.36%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
CSIBX Calvert Bond Fund | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
CSIBX vs. LMSMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSIBX Calvert Bond Fund | -0.87% | 7.93% | 2.45% | 6.55% | -12.85% | 0.11% | 7.39% | 8.44% | -0.16% | 3.85% |
LMSMX Western Asset SMASh Series M Fund | 0.82% | 12.15% | -1.72% | 5.13% | -23.44% | -2.32% | 12.86% | 7.71% | 1.46% | 5.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between CSIBX and LMSMX is 0.85, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.85 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.90 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2017 | 0.85 |
The correlation between CSIBX and LMSMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CSIBX vs. LMSMX — Risk / Return Rank
CSIBX
LMSMX
CSIBX vs. LMSMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calvert Bond Fund (CSIBX) and Western Asset SMASh Series M Fund (LMSMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CSIBX | LMSMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.56 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.97 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.26 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.95 | 2.35 | -1.40 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.37 | 5.83 | -3.46 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CSIBX vs. LMSMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSIBX drawdown since its inception was -17.57%, smaller than the maximum LMSMX drawdown of -30.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSIBX and LMSMX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSIBX | LMSMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.57% | -30.76% | +13.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.14% | -2.64% | -0.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.15% | -10.50% | +5.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.57% | -30.06% | +12.49% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -17.57% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.60% | -12.80% | +10.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.05% | -10.16% | +8.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.26% | 1.06% | +0.20% |
Volatility
CSIBX vs. LMSMX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Calvert Bond Fund (CSIBX) is 0.98%, while Western Asset SMASh Series M Fund (LMSMX) has a volatility of 1.14%. This indicates that CSIBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LMSMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CSIBX | LMSMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.98% | 1.14% | -0.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.13% | 2.99% | +0.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.88% | 4.68% | -0.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.52% | 10.37% | -4.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.56% | 8.11% | -3.55% |
CSIBX vs. LMSMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CSIBX has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is higher than LMSMX's 0.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
CSIBX vs. LMSMX - Dividend Comparison
CSIBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.97%, less than LMSMX's 4.52% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSIBX Calvert Bond Fund | 3.97% | 4.35% | 4.18% | 3.28% | 2.34% | 3.12% | 3.39% | 3.43% | 2.49% | 2.22% | 2.58% | 2.45% |
LMSMX Western Asset SMASh Series M Fund | 4.52% | 4.20% | 5.24% | 4.68% | 3.40% | 3.78% | 6.84% | 7.19% | 3.18% | 3.24% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CSIBX and LMSMX have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LMSMX has higher volatility (1.14%) compared to CSIBX (0.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CSIBX dropped -17.57% vs LMSMX's -30.76%.
LMSMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.33 vs 0.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CSIBX and LMSMX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer