CSGIX vs. DFVQX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CSGIX (Calamos International Small Cap Growth Fund) and DFVQX (DFA International Vector Equity Portfolio) are both Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities funds. Over the past 3 years, CSGIX returned 24.69%/yr vs 20.79%/yr for DFVQX. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CSGIX charges 2.67%/yr vs 0.36%/yr for DFVQX.

Performance

CSGIX vs. DFVQX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calamos International Small Cap Growth Fund (CSGIX) and DFA International Vector Equity Portfolio (DFVQX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSGIX achieves a 35.70% return, which is significantly higher than DFVQX's 11.85% return.

CSGIX

• 1D: -0.97%
• 1M: 7.21%
• YTD: 35.70%
• 6M: 38.48%
• 1Y: 36.65%
• 3Y*: 24.69%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DFVQX

• 1D: 0.25%
• 1M: 3.28%
• YTD: 11.85%
• 6M: 15.01%
• 1Y: 30.09%
• 3Y*: 20.79%
• 5Y*: 10.37%
• 10Y*: 9.99%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CSGIX vs. DFVQX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
CSGIX Calamos International Small Cap Growth Fund	35.70%	15.11%	10.21%	13.62%	-20.14%
DFVQX DFA International Vector Equity Portfolio	11.85%	38.02%	4.55%	17.05%	-8.38%

Correlation

The correlation between CSGIX and DFVQX is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.74
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.78
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2022	0.83

The correlation between CSGIX and DFVQX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

CSGIX vs. DFVQX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CSGIX

CSGIX Risk / Return Rank: 39
CSGIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
CSGIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
CSGIX Omega Ratio Rank: 39
CSGIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
CSGIX Martin Ratio Rank: 31

DFVQX

DFVQX Risk / Return Rank: 51
DFVQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
DFVQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
DFVQX Omega Ratio Rank: 51
DFVQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
DFVQX Martin Ratio Rank: 51

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CSGIX vs. DFVQX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos International Small Cap Growth Fund (CSGIX) and DFA International Vector Equity Portfolio (DFVQX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CSGIX	DFVQX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.85	2.18	-0.32
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.54	3.02	-0.48
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.39	-0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.64	2.69	-0.05
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.04	10.47	-3.43
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CSGIX vs. DFVQX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSGIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.85, which is comparable to the DFVQX Sharpe Ratio of 2.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSGIX and DFVQX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CSGIX	DFVQX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.85	2.18	-0.32
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.67	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.61	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.64	0.61	+0.03

Drawdowns

CSGIX vs. DFVQX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSGIX drawdown since its inception was -26.50%, smaller than the maximum DFVQX drawdown of -44.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSGIX and DFVQX.

Drawdown Indicators

	CSGIX	DFVQX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.50%	-44.58%	+18.08%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.68%	-10.98%	-2.70%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.13%	-13.00%	-7.13%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-28.33%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-44.58%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.05%	-0.65%	-1.40%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.25%	-7.85%	-2.40%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.12%	2.80%	+2.32%

Volatility

CSGIX vs. DFVQX - Volatility Comparison

Calamos International Small Cap Growth Fund (CSGIX) has a higher volatility of 7.90% compared to DFA International Vector Equity Portfolio (DFVQX) at 4.02%. This indicates that CSGIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFVQX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CSGIX	DFVQX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.90%	4.02%	+3.88%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.77%	11.02%	+5.75%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.55%	13.62%	+5.93%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.66%	15.64%	+2.02%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.66%	16.54%	+1.12%

CSGIX vs. DFVQX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CSGIX has a 2.67% expense ratio, which is higher than DFVQX's 0.36% expense ratio.

Dividends

CSGIX vs. DFVQX - Dividend Comparison

CSGIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%, less than DFVQX's 2.91% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CSGIX Calamos International Small Cap Growth Fund	0.90%	1.22%	0.00%	0.00%	0.71%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
DFVQX DFA International Vector Equity Portfolio	2.91%	3.06%	3.56%	3.47%	2.73%	4.76%	1.79%	2.68%	5.96%	1.81%	2.15%	2.77%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CSGIX and DFVQX in my portfolio?

CSGIX and DFVQX have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CSGIX or DFVQX?

CSGIX has higher volatility (7.90%) compared to DFVQX (4.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CSGIX dropped -26.50% vs DFVQX's -44.58%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DFVQX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.18 vs 1.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.