CSGIX vs. ARHBX

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Calamos International Small Cap Growth Fund (CSGIX) and Artisan International Explorer Fund (ARHBX).

CSGIX is managed by Calamos. It was launched on Mar 30, 2022. ARHBX is managed by Artisan. It was launched on May 15, 2022.

Performance

CSGIX vs. ARHBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calamos International Small Cap Growth Fund (CSGIX) and Artisan International Explorer Fund (ARHBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CSGIX vs. ARHBX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
CSGIX Calamos International Small Cap Growth Fund	2.83%	15.11%	10.21%	13.62%	-5.93%
ARHBX Artisan International Explorer Fund	0.92%	18.32%	8.34%	20.65%	-2.64%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSGIX achieves a 2.83% return, which is significantly higher than ARHBX's 0.92% return.

CSGIX

• 1D: -1.69%
• 1M: -13.68%
• YTD: 2.83%
• 6M: -5.44%
• 1Y: 23.73%
• 3Y*: 12.84%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ARHBX

• 1D: -0.68%
• 1M: -7.06%
• YTD: 0.92%
• 6M: 0.36%
• 1Y: 12.75%
• 3Y*: 10.84%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CSGIX vs. ARHBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CSGIX has a 2.67% expense ratio, which is higher than ARHBX's 1.35% expense ratio.

CSGIX

Calamos International Small Cap Growth Fund

ARHBX

Artisan International Explorer Fund

Return for Risk

CSGIX vs. ARHBX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CSGIX

CSGIX Risk / Return Rank: 59
CSGIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
CSGIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
CSGIX Omega Ratio Rank: 57
CSGIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
CSGIX Martin Ratio Rank: 40

ARHBX

ARHBX Risk / Return Rank: 42
ARHBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
ARHBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
ARHBX Omega Ratio Rank: 37
ARHBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
ARHBX Martin Ratio Rank: 31

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CSGIX vs. ARHBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos International Small Cap Growth Fund (CSGIX) and Artisan International Explorer Fund (ARHBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CSGIX	ARHBX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.24	0.94	+0.30
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.65	1.33	+0.31
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.17	+0.06
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.54	1.15	+0.38
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.20	3.33	+0.86
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CSGIX vs. ARHBX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSGIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.24, which is higher than the ARHBX Sharpe Ratio of 0.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSGIX and ARHBX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CSGIX	ARHBX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.24	0.94	+0.30
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.25	0.83	-0.58

Correlation

The correlation between CSGIX and ARHBX is 0.71, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

CSGIX vs. ARHBX - Dividend Comparison

CSGIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.19%, less than ARHBX's 7.37% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
CSGIX Calamos International Small Cap Growth Fund	1.19%	1.22%	0.00%	0.00%	0.71%
ARHBX Artisan International Explorer Fund	7.37%	7.44%	4.86%	1.97%	0.16%

Drawdowns

CSGIX vs. ARHBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSGIX drawdown since its inception was -26.50%, which is greater than ARHBX's maximum drawdown of -18.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSGIX and ARHBX.

Drawdown Indicators

	CSGIX	ARHBX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.50%	-18.10%	-8.40%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.68%	-9.51%	-4.17%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-13.68%	-7.06%	-6.62%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.62%	-3.61%	-7.01%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.01%	3.30%	+1.71%

Volatility

CSGIX vs. ARHBX - Volatility Comparison

Calamos International Small Cap Growth Fund (CSGIX) has a higher volatility of 8.69% compared to Artisan International Explorer Fund (ARHBX) at 6.18%. This indicates that CSGIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ARHBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CSGIX	ARHBX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.69%	6.18%	+2.51%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.97%	9.24%	+4.73%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.46%	13.06%	+5.40%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.05%	13.83%	+3.22%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.05%	13.83%	+3.22%