CSEN vs. BESF

Last updated Jul 15, 2026

CSEN (Cohen & Steers Future of Energy Active ETF) and BESF (Bastion Energy ETF) are both Energy Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.80% expense ratio.

Performance

CSEN vs. BESF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cohen & Steers Future of Energy Active ETF (CSEN) and Bastion Energy ETF (BESF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

CSEN

• 1D: 0.84%
• 1M: -0.75%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BESF

• 1D: 0.22%
• 1M: 0.96%
• 6M: 15.61%
• YTD: 19.68%
• 1Y: 56.79%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CSEN vs. BESF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
CSEN Cohen & Steers Future of Energy Active ETF	-0.75%
BESF Bastion Energy ETF	0.96%

Correlation

The correlation between CSEN and BESF is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 15, 2026	0.57

Return for Risk

CSEN vs. BESF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CSEN

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BESF

BESF Risk / Return Rank: 87
BESF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
BESF Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
BESF Omega Ratio Rank: 82
BESF Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
BESF Martin Ratio Rank: 82

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CSEN vs. BESF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cohen & Steers Future of Energy Active ETF (CSEN) and Bastion Energy ETF (BESF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CSEN	BESF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.32	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	3.15	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.38	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	5.20	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	12.77	—

Drawdowns

CSEN vs. BESF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSEN drawdown since its inception was -5.10%, smaller than the maximum BESF drawdown of -10.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSEN and BESF.

Drawdown Indicators

	CSEN	BESF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-5.10%	-10.97%	+5.87%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-10.97%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.00%	-5.93%	+4.93%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.76%	-3.03%	+0.27%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	4.46%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CSEN	BESF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	6.39%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	14.92%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.52%	24.57%	-9.05%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.52%	24.22%	-8.70%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.52%	24.22%	-8.70%

CSEN vs. BESF - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both CSEN and BESF have an expense ratio of 0.80%.

Dividends

CSEN vs. BESF - Dividend Comparison

CSEN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%, less than BESF's 5.75% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
BESF Bastion Energy ETF	5.75%	6.39%
CSEN Cohen & Steers Future of Energy Active ETF	0.33%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CSEN and BESF in my portfolio?

CSEN and BESF have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CSEN or BESF?

Both ETFs have the same 0.80% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CSEN or BESF?

CSEN and BESF have the same expense ratio: 0.80% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CSEN or BESF?

BESF has the higher dividend yield at 5.75%, compared with 0.33% for CSEN.

What is the main difference between CSEN and BESF?

They also come from different issuers: Cohen & Steers and Bastion.