CSDIX vs. AWP

Last updated Jul 15, 2026

CSDIX (Cohen & Steers Real Estate Securities Fund CLASS I) and AWP (abrdn Global Premier Properties Fund) are both REIT funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 10 years, CSDIX returned 6.84%/yr vs 7.57%/yr for AWP. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CSDIX charges 0.84%/yr vs 1.19%/yr for AWP.

Performance

CSDIX vs. AWP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cohen & Steers Real Estate Securities Fund CLASS I (CSDIX) and abrdn Global Premier Properties Fund (AWP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSDIX achieves a 15.10% return, which is significantly higher than AWP's 10.63% return. Over the past 10 years, CSDIX has underperformed AWP with an annualized return of 6.84%, while AWP has yielded a comparatively higher 7.57% annualized return.

CSDIX

• 1D: 0.41%
• 1M: -0.02%
• 6M: 13.34%
• YTD: 15.10%
• 1Y: 14.09%
• 3Y*: 10.04%
• 5Y*: 3.90%
• 10Y*: 6.84%

AWP

• 1D: 0.25%
• 1M: 3.11%
• 6M: 8.65%
• YTD: 10.63%
• 1Y: 17.89%
• 3Y*: 11.90%
• 5Y*: 1.11%
• 10Y*: 7.57%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CSDIX vs. AWP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CSDIX Cohen & Steers Real Estate Securities Fund CLASS I	15.10%	4.32%	6.73%	13.18%	-26.33%	41.70%	-1.74%	31.84%	-4.25%	8.09%
AWP abrdn Global Premier Properties Fund	10.63%	12.43%	12.23%	12.58%	-37.13%	40.41%	-10.29%	42.52%	-18.47%	44.91%

Correlation

The correlation between CSDIX and AWP is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.65
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.69
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.73
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.65
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 26, 2007	0.61

The correlation between CSDIX and AWP shifts across timeframes, from 0.61 (all time) to 0.73 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

CSDIX vs. AWP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CSDIX

CSDIX Risk / Return Rank: 29
CSDIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
CSDIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
CSDIX Omega Ratio Rank: 24
CSDIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
CSDIX Martin Ratio Rank: 32

AWP

AWP Risk / Return Rank: 30
AWP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
AWP Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
AWP Omega Ratio Rank: 33
AWP Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
AWP Martin Ratio Rank: 28

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CSDIX vs. AWP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cohen & Steers Real Estate Securities Fund CLASS I (CSDIX) and abrdn Global Premier Properties Fund (AWP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CSDIX	AWP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.07	1.27	-0.20
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.51	1.79	-0.29
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	1.23	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.89	1.27	+0.62
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.62	4.99	+0.63

CSDIX vs. AWP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSDIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.07, which is comparable to the AWP Sharpe Ratio of 1.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSDIX and AWP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CSDIX vs. AWP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSDIX drawdown since its inception was -72.37%, smaller than the maximum AWP drawdown of -85.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSDIX and AWP.

Drawdown Indicators

	CSDIX	AWP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-72.37%	-85.93%	+13.56%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.91%	-14.14%	+6.23%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.23%	-23.09%	+5.86%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-33.09%	-43.93%	+10.84%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-42.68%	-53.95%	+11.27%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.12%	-1.20%	+0.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.91%	-27.25%	+16.34%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.66%	3.60%	-0.94%

Volatility

CSDIX vs. AWP - Volatility Comparison

Cohen & Steers Real Estate Securities Fund CLASS I (CSDIX) has a higher volatility of 4.88% compared to abrdn Global Premier Properties Fund (AWP) at 3.58%. This indicates that CSDIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AWP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CSDIX	AWP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.88%	3.58%	+1.30%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.00%	11.35%	-0.35%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.04%	14.20%	-0.16%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.75%	22.04%	-3.29%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.90%	23.54%	-2.64%

CSDIX vs. AWP - Expense Ratio Comparison

CSDIX has a 0.84% expense ratio, which is lower than AWP's 1.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

CSDIX vs. AWP - Dividend Comparison

CSDIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.21%, less than AWP's 12.01% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AWP abrdn Global Premier Properties Fund	12.01%	12.50%	12.44%	12.37%	12.31%	7.02%	9.13%	8.49%	12.05%	8.90%	11.70%	10.40%
CSDIX Cohen & Steers Real Estate Securities Fund CLASS I	3.21%	3.72%	2.78%	2.93%	7.67%	4.30%	5.39%	7.62%	3.60%	2.52%	5.84%	19.24%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CSDIX and AWP in my portfolio?

CSDIX and AWP have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CSDIX or AWP?

CSDIX has higher volatility (4.88%) compared to AWP (3.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CSDIX dropped -72.37% vs AWP's -85.93%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AWP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.27 vs 1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.