PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CSDAX vs. FUMBX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CSDAX vs. FUMBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calvert Short Duration Income Fund (CSDAX) and Fidelity Short-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund (FUMBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSDAX achieves a 0.36% return, which is significantly higher than FUMBX's -0.11% return.


CSDAX

1D
-0.13%
1M
0.22%
YTD
0.36%
6M
0.86%
1Y
3.90%
3Y*
5.20%
5Y*
2.45%
10Y*
2.65%

FUMBX

1D
-0.10%
1M
0.16%
YTD
-0.11%
6M
0.24%
1Y
2.69%
3Y*
4.03%
5Y*
1.31%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CSDAX vs. FUMBX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CSDAX
Calvert Short Duration Income Fund
0.36%6.22%5.00%6.58%-5.36%0.88%4.52%6.21%0.05%0.03%
FUMBX
Fidelity Short-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund
-0.11%5.83%3.25%4.47%-5.84%-1.38%4.22%4.19%1.47%-0.33%

Correlation

The correlation between CSDAX and FUMBX is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 19, 2017

0.77

The correlation between CSDAX and FUMBX shifts across timeframes, from 0.77 (all time) to 0.88 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CSDAX vs. FUMBX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CSDAX
CSDAX Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
CSDAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSDAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSDAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
CSDAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSDAX Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

FUMBX
FUMBX Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
FUMBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FUMBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
FUMBX Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
FUMBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
FUMBX Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CSDAX vs. FUMBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calvert Short Duration Income Fund (CSDAX) and Fidelity Short-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund (FUMBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CSDAXFUMBXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.28

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.63

1.89

+0.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.77

5.55

+4.21

CSDAX vs. FUMBX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSDAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is higher than the FUMBX Sharpe Ratio of 1.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSDAX and FUMBX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CSDAX vs. FUMBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSDAX drawdown since its inception was -9.96%, which is greater than FUMBX's maximum drawdown of -8.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSDAX and FUMBX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CSDAXFUMBXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.96%

-8.83%

-1.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.51%

-1.54%

+0.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.51%

-1.57%

+0.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-8.14%

-8.60%

+0.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-9.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.59%

-1.06%

+0.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.71%

-1.85%

+1.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.41%

0.52%

-0.11%

Volatility

CSDAX vs. FUMBX - Volatility Comparison

Calvert Short Duration Income Fund (CSDAX) and Fidelity Short-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund (FUMBX) have volatilities of 0.73% and 0.70%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CSDAXFUMBXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.73%

0.70%

+0.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.56%

1.56%

0.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.06%

2.08%

-0.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.40%

2.93%

-0.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.31%

2.49%

-0.18%

CSDAX vs. FUMBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CSDAX has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is higher than FUMBX's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

CSDAX vs. FUMBX - Dividend Comparison

CSDAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.37%, more than FUMBX's 3.77% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CSDAX
Calvert Short Duration Income Fund
4.37%4.42%4.28%3.24%1.95%2.25%2.58%2.79%2.67%1.84%2.07%1.84%
FUMBX
Fidelity Short-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund
3.77%3.51%2.91%1.64%0.86%1.15%1.41%1.88%1.64%0.34%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CSDAX and FUMBX have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CSDAX has higher volatility (0.73%) compared to FUMBX (0.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CSDAX dropped -9.96% vs FUMBX's -8.83%.

CSDAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CSDAX and FUMBX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer