PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CSDA.DE vs. CSSC.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CSDA.DE vs. CSSC.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in CoinShares Physical Staked Cardano EUR (CSDA.DE) and CoinShares Physical Smart Contract Platform ETP (CSSC.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CSDA.DE vs. CSSC.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
CSDA.DE
CoinShares Physical Staked Cardano EUR
-30.34%-63.21%50.69%80.97%
CSSC.DE
CoinShares Physical Smart Contract Platform ETP
-24.98%-35.55%50.17%86.11%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSDA.DE achieves a -30.34% return, which is significantly lower than CSSC.DE's -24.98% return.


CSDA.DE

1D
-4.48%
1M
-11.98%
YTD
-30.34%
6M
-68.52%
1Y
-65.27%
3Y*
-15.87%
5Y*
10Y*

CSSC.DE

1D
-2.88%
1M
4.66%
YTD
-24.98%
6M
-51.86%
1Y
-22.12%
3Y*
7.61%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CSDA.DE vs. CSSC.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

CSDA.DE has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than CSSC.DE's 0.00% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

CSDA.DE vs. CSSC.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CSDA.DE
CSDA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
CSDA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSDA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSDA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
CSDA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSDA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

CSSC.DE
CSSC.DE Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
CSSC.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSSC.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSSC.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
CSSC.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSSC.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CSDA.DE vs. CSSC.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CoinShares Physical Staked Cardano EUR (CSDA.DE) and CoinShares Physical Smart Contract Platform ETP (CSSC.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CSDA.DECSSC.DEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.89

-0.37

-0.52

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-1.52

-0.17

-1.36

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.84

0.98

-0.14

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.91

-0.39

-0.52

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.61

-0.76

-0.84

CSDA.DE vs. CSSC.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSDA.DE Sharpe Ratio is -0.89, which is lower than the CSSC.DE Sharpe Ratio of -0.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSDA.DE and CSSC.DE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CSDA.DECSSC.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.89

-0.37

-0.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.29

0.17

-0.46

Correlation

The correlation between CSDA.DE and CSSC.DE is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

CSDA.DE vs. CSSC.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither CSDA.DE nor CSSC.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

CSDA.DE vs. CSSC.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSDA.DE drawdown since its inception was -81.86%, which is greater than CSSC.DE's maximum drawdown of -65.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSDA.DE and CSSC.DE.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CSDA.DECSSC.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-81.86%

-65.21%

-16.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-73.48%

-61.70%

-11.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-81.86%

-61.76%

-20.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-57.16%

-26.26%

-30.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

41.52%

31.43%

+10.09%

Volatility

CSDA.DE vs. CSSC.DE - Volatility Comparison

CoinShares Physical Staked Cardano EUR (CSDA.DE) has a higher volatility of 16.87% compared to CoinShares Physical Smart Contract Platform ETP (CSSC.DE) at 14.27%. This indicates that CSDA.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSSC.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CSDA.DECSSC.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.87%

14.27%

+2.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

52.16%

41.39%

+10.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

73.51%

59.72%

+13.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

84.41%

60.74%

+23.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

84.41%

60.74%

+23.67%