CSCO vs. QCOM
CSCO (Cisco Systems, Inc.) and QCOM (QUALCOMM Incorporated) are both stocks. Both are in the Technology sector — CSCO in Communication Equipment, QCOM in Semiconductors. Over the past 10 years, CSCO returned 18.77%/yr vs 18.04%/yr for QCOM. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CSCO vs. QCOM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CSCO achieves a 56.90% return, which is significantly higher than QCOM's 26.42% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with CSCO having a 18.77% annualized return and QCOM not far behind at 18.04%.
CSCO
- 1D
- -0.50%
- 1M
- 1.15%
- YTD
- 56.90%
- 6M
- 55.85%
- 1Y
- 86.72%
- 3Y*
- 35.63%
- 5Y*
- 21.03%
- 10Y*
- 18.77%
QCOM
- 1D
- -3.05%
- 1M
- 6.64%
- YTD
- 26.42%
- 6M
- 22.78%
- 1Y
- 39.34%
- 3Y*
- 23.03%
- 5Y*
- 11.99%
- 10Y*
- 18.04%
CSCO vs. QCOM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSCO Cisco Systems, Inc. | 56.90% | 33.47% | 21.00% | 9.30% | -22.46% | 45.76% | -3.49% | 13.81% | 16.57% | 31.27% |
QCOM QUALCOMM Incorporated | 26.42% | 13.84% | 8.31% | 35.07% | -38.58% | 22.25% | 77.08% | 60.76% | -7.59% | 2.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between CSCO and QCOM is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 1991 | 0.44 |
Over the past year, the correlation between CSCO and QCOM has dropped to 0.20 - well below their long-term average of 0.44, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
CSCO:
$476.73B
QCOM:
$229.48B
CSCO:
$3.00
QCOM:
$9.11
CSCO:
39.89
QCOM:
23.49
CSCO:
7.85
QCOM:
5.24
CSCO:
9.76
QCOM:
8.41
CSCO:
$60.75B
QCOM:
$44.49B
CSCO:
$39.08B
QCOM:
$24.38B
CSCO:
$13.98B
QCOM:
$12.92B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CSCO vs. QCOM — Risk / Return Rank
CSCO
QCOM
CSCO vs. QCOM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO) and QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CSCO | QCOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.95 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | 1.20 | +0.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.42 | 1.19 | +5.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.47 | 2.64 | +14.82 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CSCO vs. QCOM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSCO drawdown since its inception was -89.26%, roughly equal to the maximum QCOM drawdown of -86.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSCO and QCOM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSCO | QCOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -89.26% | -86.75% | -2.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.57% | -33.13% | +19.56% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.16% | -44.23% | +24.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.68% | -44.29% | +7.61% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.95% | -44.29% | +2.34% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.02% | -14.40% | +6.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -40.11% | -32.87% | -7.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.98% | 14.93% | -9.95% |
Volatility
CSCO vs. QCOM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO) is 11.99%, while QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM) has a volatility of 27.02%. This indicates that CSCO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QCOM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CSCO | QCOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.99% | 27.02% | -15.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.19% | 42.46% | -15.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.89% | 48.73% | -17.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.88% | 41.24% | -16.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.90% | 39.32% | -13.42% |
Dividends
CSCO vs. QCOM - Dividend Comparison
CSCO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.38%, less than QCOM's 1.68% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSCO Cisco Systems, Inc. | 1.38% | 2.12% | 2.69% | 3.07% | 3.17% | 2.32% | 3.20% | 2.88% | 2.95% | 2.95% | 3.28% | 3.02% |
QCOM QUALCOMM Incorporated | 1.68% | 2.06% | 2.18% | 2.18% | 2.67% | 1.47% | 1.69% | 2.81% | 4.27% | 3.50% | 3.17% | 3.72% |
Financials
CSCO vs. QCOM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cisco Systems, Inc. and QUALCOMM Incorporated. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CSCO vs. QCOM - Profitability Comparison
CSCO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cisco Systems, Inc. reported a gross profit of 10.08B and revenue of 15.84B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 63.6%.
QCOM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, QUALCOMM Incorporated reported a gross profit of 5.70B and revenue of 10.60B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 53.8%.
CSCO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cisco Systems, Inc. reported an operating income of 3.96B and revenue of 15.84B, resulting in an operating margin of 25.0%.
QCOM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, QUALCOMM Incorporated reported an operating income of 2.31B and revenue of 10.60B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.8%.
CSCO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cisco Systems, Inc. reported a net income of 3.37B and revenue of 15.84B, resulting in a net margin of 21.3%.
QCOM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, QUALCOMM Incorporated reported a net income of 7.37B and revenue of 10.60B, resulting in a net margin of 69.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CSCO and QCOM have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QCOM has higher volatility (27.02%) compared to CSCO (11.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CSCO dropped -89.26% vs QCOM's -86.75%.
CSCO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.83 vs 0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CSCO and QCOM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer