PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CSCO vs. NVDA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CSCO vs. NVDA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSCO achieves a 45.81% return, which is significantly higher than NVDA's 9.13% return. Over the past 10 years, CSCO has underperformed NVDA with an annualized return of 17.11%, while NVDA has yielded a comparatively higher 65.23% annualized return.


CSCO

1D
-1.11%
1M
-7.05%
6M
48.58%
YTD
45.81%
1Y
66.04%
3Y*
31.55%
5Y*
18.76%
10Y*
17.11%
ALL TIME*
23.44%

NVDA

1D
0.23%
1M
-3.52%
6M
9.29%
YTD
9.13%
1Y
18.06%
3Y*
66.27%
5Y*
60.07%
10Y*
65.23%
ALL TIME*
36.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CSCO vs. NVDA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CSCO
Cisco Systems, Inc.
45.81%33.47%21.00%9.30%-22.46%45.76%-3.49%13.81%16.57%31.27%
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
9.13%38.92%171.25%239.02%-50.26%125.48%122.30%76.94%-30.82%81.99%

Correlation

The correlation between CSCO and NVDA is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 1999

0.46

The correlation between CSCO and NVDA shifts across timeframes, from 0.27 (3 years) to 0.46 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CSCO:

$436.32B

NVDA:

$4.92T

EPS

CSCO:

$3.00

NVDA:

$6.53

PE Ratio

CSCO:

36.93

NVDA:

31.15

PEG Ratio

CSCO:

30.99

NVDA:

0.17

PS Ratio

CSCO:

7.27

NVDA:

19.61

PB Ratio

CSCO:

9.03

NVDA:

25.37

Total Revenue (TTM)

CSCO:

$60.75B

NVDA:

$253.49B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CSCO:

$39.08B

NVDA:

$187.95B

EBITDA (TTM)

CSCO:

$13.98B

NVDA:

$192.76B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CSCO vs. NVDA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CSCO
CSCO Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
CSCO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSCO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSCO Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
CSCO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSCO Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

NVDA
NVDA Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
NVDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVDA Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
NVDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVDA Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CSCO vs. NVDA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CSCONVDADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.11

+0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.33

0.90

+3.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.24

1.90

+9.34

CSCO vs. NVDA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSCO Sharpe Ratio is 2.04, which is higher than the NVDA Sharpe Ratio of 0.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSCO and NVDA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CSCO vs. NVDA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSCO drawdown since its inception was -89.26%, roughly equal to the maximum NVDA drawdown of -89.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSCO and NVDA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CSCONVDADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-89.26%

-89.72%

+0.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.33%

-20.21%

+4.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.16%

-36.88%

+16.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.68%

-66.34%

+29.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.95%

-66.34%

+24.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.53%

-13.67%

-0.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-40.04%

-36.10%

-3.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.89%

9.50%

-3.61%

Volatility

CSCO vs. NVDA - Volatility Comparison

Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) have volatilities of 11.23% and 10.95%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CSCONVDADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.23%

10.95%

+0.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

29.10%

27.74%

+1.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.66%

35.88%

-3.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.31%

51.81%

-26.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.05%

49.92%

-23.87%

Dividends

CSCO vs. NVDA - Dividend Comparison

CSCO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.50%, more than NVDA's 0.14% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CSCO
Cisco Systems, Inc.
1.50%2.12%2.69%3.07%3.17%2.32%3.20%2.88%2.95%2.95%3.28%3.02%
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
0.14%0.02%0.03%0.03%0.11%0.05%0.12%0.27%0.46%0.29%0.45%1.20%

Financials

CSCO vs. NVDA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cisco Systems, Inc. and NVIDIA Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B20222023202420252026
15.84B
81.62B
(CSCO) Total Revenue
(NVDA) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CSCO vs. NVDA - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Cisco Systems, Inc. and NVIDIA Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
63.6%
74.9%
Portfolio components
CSCO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Cisco Systems, Inc. reported a gross profit of 10.08B and revenue of 15.84B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 63.6%.

NVDA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported a gross profit of 61.16B and revenue of 81.62B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 74.9%.

CSCO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Cisco Systems, Inc. reported an operating income of 3.96B and revenue of 15.84B, resulting in an operating margin of 25.0%.

NVDA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported an operating income of 53.54B and revenue of 81.62B, resulting in an operating margin of 65.6%.

CSCO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Cisco Systems, Inc. reported a net income of 3.37B and revenue of 15.84B, resulting in a net margin of 21.3%.

NVDA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported a net income of 58.32B and revenue of 81.62B, resulting in a net margin of 71.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CSCO and NVDA have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CSCO has higher volatility (11.23%) compared to NVDA (10.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CSCO dropped -89.26% vs NVDA's -89.72%.

CSCO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.04 vs 0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CSCO and NVDA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer